Dynamic Point Cloud Denoising via Manifold-to-Manifold Distance
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
3D dynamic point clouds provide a natural discrete representation of real-world objects or scenes in motion, with a wide range of applications in immersive telepresence, autonomous driving, surveillance, etc. Nevertheless, dynamic point clouds are often perturbed by noise due to hardware, software or other causes. While a plethora of methods have been proposed for static point cloud denoising, few efforts are made for the denoising of dynamic point clouds, which is quite challenging due to the irregular sampling patterns both spatially and temporally. In this paper, we represent dynamic point clouds naturally on spatial-temporal graphs, and exploit the temporal consistency with respect to the underlying surface (manifold). In particular, we define a manifold-to-manifold distance and its discrete counterpart on graphs to measure the variation-based intrinsic distance between surface patches in the temporal domain, provided that graph operators are discrete counterparts of functionals on Riemannian manifolds. Then, we construct the spatial-temporal graph connectivity between corresponding surface patches based on the temporal distance and between points in adjacent patches in the spatial domain. Leveraging the initial graph representation, we formulate dynamic point cloud denoising as the joint optimization of the desired point cloud and underlying graph representation, regularized by both spatial smoothness and temporal consistency. We reformulate the optimization and present an efficient algorithm. Experimental results show that the proposed method significantly outperforms independent denoising of each frame from state-of-the-art static point cloud denoising approaches, on both Gaussian noise and simulated LiDAR noise.
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 17 Mar 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 5; 2023: 3; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.
12 papers.
- 2021Score-Based Point Cloud Denoisingcited by 83
- 2021Deep Point Set Resampling via Gradient Fieldscited by 24
- 2022PUFA-GAN: A Frequency-Aware Generative Adversarial Network for 3D Point Cloud Upsamplingcited by 18
- 2023GQE-Net: A Graph-based Quality Enhancement Network for Point Cloud Color Attributecited by 9
- 2022MODNet: Multi-offset Point Cloud Denoising Network Customized for Multi-scale Patchescited by 5
- 2025High Efficiency Wiener Filter-based Point Cloud Quality Enhancement for MPEG G-PCCcited by 5
- 2022Dynamic Point Cloud Denoising via Gradient Fieldscited by 4
- 2023NoiseTrans: Point Cloud Denoising with Transformerscited by 2
- 2022Gradient-based Point Cloud Denoising with Uniformitycited by 1
- 2022Incomplete Gamma Kernels: Generalizing Locally Optimal Projection Operatorscited by 0
- 2023NSANet: Noise Seeking Attention Networkcited by 0
- 2024Rotation Perturbation Robustness in Point Cloud Analysis: A Perspective of Manifold Distillationcited by 0
- 2025High Efficiency Wiener Filter-based Point Cloud Quality Enhancement for MPEG G-PCC21 Mar 2025
- 2024Rotation Perturbation Robustness in Point Cloud Analysis: A Perspective of Manifold Distillation4 Nov 2024
- 2023NoiseTrans: Point Cloud Denoising with Transformers24 Apr 2023
- 2023GQE-Net: A Graph-based Quality Enhancement Network for Point Cloud Color Attribute24 Mar 2023
- 2023NSANet: Noise Seeking Attention Network26 Feb 2023
- 2022MODNet: Multi-offset Point Cloud Denoising Network Customized for Multi-scale Patches30 Aug 2022
- 2022Gradient-based Point Cloud Denoising with Uniformity21 Jul 2022
- 2022Incomplete Gamma Kernels: Generalizing Locally Optimal Projection Operators2 May 2022
- 2022Dynamic Point Cloud Denoising via Gradient Fields19 Apr 2022
- 2022PUFA-GAN: A Frequency-Aware Generative Adversarial Network for 3D Point Cloud Upsampling2 Mar 2022
- 2021Deep Point Set Resampling via Gradient Fields3 Nov 2021
- 2021Score-Based Point Cloud Denoising23 Jul 2021