Harnessing Explanations to Bridge AI and Humans
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Machine learning models are increasingly integrated into societally critical applications such as recidivism prediction and medical diagnosis, thanks to their superior predictive power. In these applications, however, full automation is often not desired due to ethical and legal concerns. The research community has thus ventured into developing interpretable methods that explain machine predictions. While these explanations are meant to assist humans in understanding machine predictions and thereby allowing humans to make better decisions, this hypothesis is not supported in many recent studies. To improve human decision-making with AI assistance, we propose future directions for closing the gap between the efficacy of explanations and improvement in human performance.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 16 Mar 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 0; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.
3 papers.
- 2021Reframing Human-AI Collaboration for Generating Free-Text Explanationscited by 125
- 2021To Trust or Not to Trust a Regressor: Estimating and Explaining Trustworthiness of Regression Predictionscited by 5
- 2025Achieving Trustworthy Real-Time Decision Support Systems with Low-Latency Interpretable AI Modelscited by 1
- 2025Achieving Trustworthy Real-Time Decision Support Systems with Low-Latency Interpretable AI Models24 Jun 2025
- 2021Reframing Human-AI Collaboration for Generating Free-Text Explanations16 Dec 2021
- 2021To Trust or Not to Trust a Regressor: Estimating and Explaining Trustworthiness of Regression Predictions14 Apr 2021