mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

QED at Large: A Survey of Engineering of Formally Verified Software

arXiv 2003.06458 ↗First posted 13 Mar 2020cs.LO cs.PLcited by 13

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Development of formal proofs of correctness of programs can increase actual and perceived reliability and facilitate better understanding of program specifications and their underlying assumptions. Tools supporting such development have been available for over 40 years, but have only recently seen wide practical use. Projects based on construction of machine-checked formal proofs are now reaching an unprecedented scale, comparable to large software projects, which leads to new challenges in proof development and maintenance. Despite its increasing importance, the field of proof engineering is seldom considered in its own right; related theories, techniques, and tools span many fields and venues. This survey of the literature presents a holistic understanding of proof engineering for program correctness, covering impact in practice, foundations, proof automation, proof organization, and practical proof development.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 13 Mar 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 3; 2024: 4; 2025: 3; 2026: 2.

13 papers.

Sort:

By area: