Explainable Agents Through Social Cues: A Review
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The issue of how to make embodied agents explainable has experienced a surge of interest over the last three years, and, there are many terms that refer to this concept, e.g., transparency or legibility. One reason for this high variance in terminology is the unique array of social cues that embodied agents can access in contrast to that accessed by non-embodied agents. Another reason is that different authors use these terms in different ways. Hence, we review the existing literature on explainability and organize it by (1) providing an overview of existing definitions, (2) showing how explainability is implemented and how it exploits different social cues, and (3) showing how the impact of explainability is measured. Additionally, we present a list of open questions and challenges that highlight areas that require further investigation by the community. This provides the interested reader with an overview of the current state-of-the-art.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 11 Mar 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1.
1 paper.
- 2021Towards Teachable Autotelic Agentscited by 2
- 2021Towards Teachable Autotelic Agents25 May 2021