Slice Tuner: A Selective Data Acquisition Framework for Accurate and Fair Machine Learning Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
As machine learning becomes democratized in the era of Software 2.0, a serious bottleneck is acquiring enough data to ensure accurate and fair models. Recent techniques including crowdsourcing provide cost-effective ways to gather such data. However, simply acquiring data as much as possible is not necessarily an effective strategy for optimizing accuracy and fairness. For example, if an online app store has enough training data for certain slices of data (say American customers), but not for others, obtaining more American customer data will only bias the model training. Instead, we contend that one needs to selectively acquire data and propose Slice Tuner, which acquires possibly-different amounts of data per slice such that the model accuracy and fairness on all slices are optimized. This problem is different than labeling existing data (as in active learning or weak supervision) because the goal is obtaining the right amounts of new data. At its core, Slice Tuner maintains learning curves of slices that estimate the model accuracies given more data and uses convex optimization to find the best data acquisition strategy. The key challenges of estimating learning curves are that they may be inaccurate if there is not enough data, and there may be dependencies among slices where acquiring data for one slice influences the learning curves of others. We solve these issues by iteratively and efficiently updating the learning curves as more data is acquired. We evaluate Slice Tuner on real datasets using crowdsourcing for data acquisition and show that Slice Tuner significantly outperforms baselines in terms of model accuracy and fairness, even when the learning curves cannot be reliably estimated.
Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 10 Mar 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 2; 2023: 3; 2024: 4; 2025: 1.
13 papers.
Sort:
By area:
- 2021Data Collection and Quality Challenges in Deep Learning: A Data-Centric AI Perspectivecited by 116
- 2021Mandoline: Model Evaluation under Distribution Shiftcited by 55
- 2022Representation Bias in Data: A Survey on Identification and Resolution Techniquescited by 37
- 2024The Data Addition Dilemmacited by 15
- 2024Fairness Without Harm: An Influence-Guided Active Sampling Approachcited by 12
- 2023VLSlice: Interactive Vision-and-Language Slice Discoverycited by 7
- 2024Falcon: Fair Active Learning using Multi-armed Banditscited by 6
- 2021Responsible AI Challenges in End-to-end Machine Learningcited by 2
- 2022Achieving Representative Data via Convex Hull Feasibility Sampling Algorithmscited by 2
- 2023Pushing the Accuracy-Group Robustness Frontier with Introspective Self-playcited by 2
- 2023Non-Invasive Fairness in Learning through the Lens of Data Driftcited by 2
- 2025Unbiased Binning for Fairness-aware Attribute Representationcited by 1
1 more
- 2025Unbiased Binning for Fairness-aware Attribute Representation26 Sep 2025
- 2024Data Acquisition for Improving Model Fairness using Reinforcement Learning4 Dec 2024
- 2024The Data Addition Dilemma8 Aug 2024
- 2024Fairness Without Harm: An Influence-Guided Active Sampling Approach20 Feb 2024
- 2024Falcon: Fair Active Learning using Multi-armed Bandits23 Jan 2024
- 2023VLSlice: Interactive Vision-and-Language Slice Discovery13 Sep 2023
- 2023Non-Invasive Fairness in Learning through the Lens of Data Drift30 Mar 2023
- 2023Pushing the Accuracy-Group Robustness Frontier with Introspective Self-play11 Feb 2023
- 2022Achieving Representative Data via Convex Hull Feasibility Sampling Algorithms13 Apr 2022
- 2022Representation Bias in Data: A Survey on Identification and Resolution Techniques22 Mar 2022
- 2021Data Collection and Quality Challenges in Deep Learning: A Data-Centric AI Perspective13 Dec 2021
- 2021Mandoline: Model Evaluation under Distribution Shift1 Jul 2021
1 more
- 2021Responsible AI Challenges in End-to-end Machine Learning15 Jan 2021
- 2021Data Collection and Quality Challenges in Deep Learning: A Data-Centric AI Perspectivecited by 116
- 2021Mandoline: Model Evaluation under Distribution Shiftcited by 55
- 2022Representation Bias in Data: A Survey on Identification and Resolution Techniquescited by 37
- 2024The Data Addition Dilemmacited by 15
- 2024Fairness Without Harm: An Influence-Guided Active Sampling Approachcited by 12
- 2023VLSlice: Interactive Vision-and-Language Slice Discoverycited by 7
- 2024Falcon: Fair Active Learning using Multi-armed Banditscited by 6
- 2021Responsible AI Challenges in End-to-end Machine Learningcited by 2
- 2022Achieving Representative Data via Convex Hull Feasibility Sampling Algorithmscited by 2
- 2023Pushing the Accuracy-Group Robustness Frontier with Introspective Self-playcited by 2
- 2023Non-Invasive Fairness in Learning through the Lens of Data Driftcited by 2
- 2025Unbiased Binning for Fairness-aware Attribute Representationcited by 1
- 2025Unbiased Binning for Fairness-aware Attribute Representation26 Sep 2025
- 2024The Data Addition Dilemma8 Aug 2024
- 2024Fairness Without Harm: An Influence-Guided Active Sampling Approach20 Feb 2024
- 2024Falcon: Fair Active Learning using Multi-armed Bandits23 Jan 2024
- 2023VLSlice: Interactive Vision-and-Language Slice Discovery13 Sep 2023
- 2023Non-Invasive Fairness in Learning through the Lens of Data Drift30 Mar 2023
- 2023Pushing the Accuracy-Group Robustness Frontier with Introspective Self-play11 Feb 2023
- 2022Achieving Representative Data via Convex Hull Feasibility Sampling Algorithms13 Apr 2022
- 2022Representation Bias in Data: A Survey on Identification and Resolution Techniques22 Mar 2022
- 2021Data Collection and Quality Challenges in Deep Learning: A Data-Centric AI Perspective13 Dec 2021
- 2021Mandoline: Model Evaluation under Distribution Shift1 Jul 2021
- 2021Responsible AI Challenges in End-to-end Machine Learning15 Jan 2021