Adaptive Semantic-Visual Tree for Hierarchical Embeddings
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Merchandise categories inherently form a semantic hierarchy with different levels of concept abstraction, especially for fine-grained categories. This hierarchy encodes rich correlations among various categories across different levels, which can effectively regularize the semantic space and thus make predictions less ambiguous. However, previous studies of fine-grained image retrieval primarily focus on semantic similarities or visual similarities. In a real application, merely using visual similarity may not satisfy the need of consumers to search merchandise with real-life images, e.g., given a red coat as a query image, we might get a red suit in recall results only based on visual similarity since they are visually similar. But the users actually want a coat rather than suit even the coat is with different color or texture attributes. We introduce this new problem based on photoshopping in real practice. That's why semantic information are integrated to regularize the margins to make "semantic" prior to "visual". To solve this new problem, we propose a hierarchical adaptive semantic-visual tree (ASVT) to depict the architecture of merchandise categories, which evaluates semantic similarities between different semantic levels and visual similarities within the same semantic class simultaneously. The semantic information satisfies the demand of consumers for similar merchandise with the query while the visual information optimizes the correlations within the semantic class. At each level, we set different margins based on the semantic hierarchy and incorporate them as prior information to learn a fine-grained feature embedding. To evaluate our framework, we propose a new dataset named JDProduct, with hierarchical labels collected from actual image queries and official merchandise images on an online shopping application. Extensive experimental results on the public CARS196 and CUB-
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 8 Mar 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 5; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.
8 papers.
- 2022Dataset Pruning: Reducing Training Data by Examining Generalization Influencecited by 132
- 2022Deep Hierarchical Semantic Segmentationcited by 84
- 2021SimpleX: A Simple and Strong Baseline for Collaborative Filteringcited by 65
- 2021Objects in Semantic Topologycited by 18
- 2022Determinantal Point Process Likelihoods for Sequential Recommendationcited by 7
- 2022Pluralistic Image Completion with Probabilistic Mixture-of-Expertscited by 1
- 2022CAFE: Learning to Condense Dataset by Aligning Featurescited by 0
- 2025Descriptive Image-Text Matching with Graded Contextual Similaritycited by 0
- 2025Descriptive Image-Text Matching with Graded Contextual Similarity15 May 2025
- 2022Dataset Pruning: Reducing Training Data by Examining Generalization Influence19 May 2022
- 2022Pluralistic Image Completion with Probabilistic Mixture-of-Experts18 May 2022
- 2022Determinantal Point Process Likelihoods for Sequential Recommendation25 Apr 2022
- 2022Deep Hierarchical Semantic Segmentation27 Mar 2022
- 2022CAFE: Learning to Condense Dataset by Aligning Features3 Mar 2022
- 2021Objects in Semantic Topology6 Oct 2021
- 2021SimpleX: A Simple and Strong Baseline for Collaborative Filtering26 Sep 2021