Is POS Tagging Necessary or Even Helpful for Neural Dependency Parsing?
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In the pre deep learning era, part-of-speech tags have been considered as indispensable ingredients for feature engineering in dependency parsing. But quite a few works focus on joint tagging and parsing models to avoid error propagation. In contrast, recent studies suggest that POS tagging becomes much less important or even useless for neural parsing, especially when using character-based word representations. Yet there are not enough investigations focusing on this issue, both empirically and linguistically. To answer this, we design and compare three typical multi-task learning framework, i.e., Share-Loose, Share-Tight, and Stack, for joint tagging and parsing based on the state-of-the-art biaffine parser. Considering that it is much cheaper to annotate POS tags than parse trees, we also investigate the utilization of large-scale heterogeneous POS tag data. We conduct experiments on both English and Chinese datasets, and the results clearly show that POS tagging (both homogeneous and heterogeneous) can still significantly improve parsing performance when using the Stack joint framework. We conduct detailed analysis and gain more insights from the linguistic aspect.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 6 Mar 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 5; 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.
9 papers.
- 2021Specializing Multilingual Language Models: An Empirical Studycited by 21
- 2021A Modest Pareto Optimisation Analysis of Dependency Parsers in 2021cited by 9
- 2021Not All Linearizations Are Equally Data-Hungry in Sequence Labeling Parsingcited by 7
- 2021A Falta de Pan, Buenas Son Tortas: The Efficacy of Predicted UPOS Tags for Low Resource UD Parsingcited by 5
- 2021What Taggers Fail to Learn, Parsers Need the Mostcited by 2
- 2022Bridging Pre-trained Language Models and Hand-crafted Features for Unsupervised POS Taggingcited by 1
- 2022Parsing linearizations appreciate PoS tags - but some are fussy about errorscited by 1
- 2023Another Dead End for Morphological Tags? Perturbed Inputs and Parsingcited by 0
- 2025Building Foundations for Natural Language Processing of Historical Turkish: Resources and Modelscited by 0
- 2025Building Foundations for Natural Language Processing of Historical Turkish: Resources and Models8 Jan 2025
- 2023Another Dead End for Morphological Tags? Perturbed Inputs and Parsing24 May 2023
- 2022Parsing linearizations appreciate PoS tags - but some are fussy about errors27 Oct 2022
- 2022Bridging Pre-trained Language Models and Hand-crafted Features for Unsupervised POS Tagging19 Mar 2022
- 2021Not All Linearizations Are Equally Data-Hungry in Sequence Labeling Parsing17 Aug 2021
- 2021Specializing Multilingual Language Models: An Empirical Study16 Jun 2021
- 2021A Falta de Pan, Buenas Son Tortas: The Efficacy of Predicted UPOS Tags for Low Resource UD Parsing8 Jun 2021
- 2021A Modest Pareto Optimisation Analysis of Dependency Parsers in 20218 Jun 2021
- 2021What Taggers Fail to Learn, Parsers Need the Most2 Apr 2021