Soft-Root-Sign Activation Function
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The choice of activation function in deep networks has a significant effect on the training dynamics and task performance. At present, the most effective and widely-used activation function is ReLU. However, because of the non-zero mean, negative missing and unbounded output, ReLU is at a potential disadvantage during optimization. To this end, we introduce a novel activation function to manage to overcome the above three challenges. The proposed nonlinearity, namely "Soft-Root-Sign" (SRS), is smooth, non-monotonic, and bounded. Notably, the bounded property of SRS distinguishes itself from most state-of-the-art activation functions. In contrast to ReLU, SRS can adaptively adjust the output by a pair of independent trainable parameters to capture negative information and provide zero-mean property, which leading not only to better generalization performance, but also to faster learning speed. It also avoids and rectifies the output distribution to be scattered in the non-negative real number space, making it more compatible with batch normalization (BN) and less sensitive to initialization. In experiments, we evaluated SRS on deep networks applied to a variety of tasks, including image classification, machine translation and generative modelling. Our SRS matches or exceeds models with ReLU and other state-of-the-art nonlinearities, showing that the proposed activation function is generalized and can achieve high performance across tasks. Ablation study further verified the compatibility with BN and self-adaptability for different initialization.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 1 Mar 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 2.
8 papers.
- 2021Activation Functions in Deep Learning: A Comprehensive Survey and Benchmarkcited by 155
- 2022How important are activation functions in regression and classification? A survey, performance comparison, and future directionscited by 29
- 2025Deep Neural Networks with General Activations: Super-Convergence in Sobolev Normscited by 6
- 2022Optimal Activation Functions for the Random Features Regression Modelcited by 4
- 2021Comparison of different convolutional neural network activation functions and methods for building ensemblescited by 2
- 2021Deep ensembles based on Stochastic Activation Selection for Polyp Segmentationcited by 1
- 2023Learning Activation Functions for Sparse Neural Networkscited by 1
- 2025SoftReMish: A Novel Activation Function for Enhanced Convolutional Neural Networks for Visual Recognition Performancecited by 0
- 2025Deep Neural Networks with General Activations: Super-Convergence in Sobolev Norms7 Aug 2025
- 2025SoftReMish: A Novel Activation Function for Enhanced Convolutional Neural Networks for Visual Recognition Performance8 Jul 2025
- 2023Learning Activation Functions for Sparse Neural Networks18 May 2023
- 2022How important are activation functions in regression and classification? A survey, performance comparison, and future directions6 Sep 2022
- 2022Optimal Activation Functions for the Random Features Regression Model31 May 2022
- 2021Activation Functions in Deep Learning: A Comprehensive Survey and Benchmark29 Sep 2021
- 2021Deep ensembles based on Stochastic Activation Selection for Polyp Segmentation2 Apr 2021
- 2021Comparison of different convolutional neural network activation functions and methods for building ensembles29 Mar 2021