Automatic Segmentation, Feature Extraction and Comparison of Healthy and Stroke Cerebral Vasculature
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Accurate segmentation of cerebral vasculature and a quantitative assessment of cerebrovascular morphology is critical to various diagnostic and therapeutic purposes and is pertinent to studying brain health and disease. However, this is still a challenging task due to the complexity of the vascular imaging data. We propose an automated method for cerebral vascular segmentation without the need of any manual intervention as well as a method to skeletonize the binary volume to extract vascular geometric features which can characterize vessel structure. We combine a probabilistic vessel-enhancing filtering with an active-contour technique to segment magnetic resonance and computed tomography angiograms (MRA and CTA) and subsequently extract the vessel centerlines and diameters to calculate the geometrical properties of the vasculature. Our method was validated using a 3D phantom of the Circle-of-Willis region with 84% mean Dice Similarity and 85% mean Pearson Correlation with minimal modified Hausdorff distance error. We applied this method to a dataset of healthy subjects and stroke patients and present a quantitative comparison between them. We found significant differences in the geometric features including total length (2.88 +/- 0.38 m for healthy and 2.20 +/- 0.67 m for stroke), volume (40.18 +/- 25.55 ml for healthy and 34.43 +/- 21.83 ml for stroke), tortuosity (3.24 +/- 0.88 rad/cm for healthy and 5.80 +/- 0.92 rad/cm for stroke) and fractality (box dimension 1.36 +/- 0.28 for healthy vs. 1.69 +/- 0.20 for stroke). This technique can be applied on any imaging modality and can be used in the future to automatically obtain the 3D segmented vasculature for diagnosis and treatment planning of Stroke and other cerebrovascular diseases (CVD) in the clinic and also to study the morphological changes caused by various CVD.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 25 Feb 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 0; 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
7 papers.
- 2024vesselFM: A Foundation Model for Universal 3D Blood Vessel Segmentationcited by 18
- 2023Deep Learning for Vascular Segmentation and Applications in Phase Contrast Tomography Imagingcited by 2
- 2021Physics-informed neural networks for improving cerebral hemodynamics predictionscited by 1
- 2023Segmentation method for cerebral blood vessels from MRA using hysteresiscited by 0
- 2024Reconstructing Blood Flow in Data-Poor Regimes: A Vasculature Network Kernel for Gaussian Process Regressioncited by 0
- 2025SWinMamba: Serpentine Window State Space Model for Vascular Segmentationcited by 0
- 2026StrokeNeXt: A Siamese-encoder Approach for Brain Stroke Classification in Computed Tomography Imagerycited by 0
- 2026StrokeNeXt: A Siamese-encoder Approach for Brain Stroke Classification in Computed Tomography Imagery16 Feb 2026
- 2025SWinMamba: Serpentine Window State Space Model for Vascular Segmentation2 Jul 2025
- 2024vesselFM: A Foundation Model for Universal 3D Blood Vessel Segmentation26 Nov 2024
- 2024Reconstructing Blood Flow in Data-Poor Regimes: A Vasculature Network Kernel for Gaussian Process Regression14 Mar 2024
- 2023Deep Learning for Vascular Segmentation and Applications in Phase Contrast Tomography Imaging22 Nov 2023
- 2023Segmentation method for cerebral blood vessels from MRA using hysteresis9 Mar 2023
- 2021Physics-informed neural networks for improving cerebral hemodynamics predictions25 Aug 2021