On the Sample Complexity of Adversarial Multi-Source PAC Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We study the problem of learning from multiple untrusted data sources, a scenario of increasing practical relevance given the recent emergence of crowdsourcing and collaborative learning paradigms. Specifically, we analyze the situation in which a learning system obtains datasets from multiple sources, some of which might be biased or even adversarially perturbed. It is known that in the single-source case, an adversary with the power to corrupt a fixed fraction of the training data can prevent PAC-learnability, that is, even in the limit of infinitely much training data, no learning system can approach the optimal test error. In this work we show that, surprisingly, the same is not true in the multi-source setting, where the adversary can arbitrarily corrupt a fixed fraction of the data sources. Our main results are a generalization bound that provides finite-sample guarantees for this learning setting, as well as corresponding lower bounds. Besides establishing PAC-learnability our results also show that in a cooperative learning setting sharing data with other parties has provable benefits, even if some participants are malicious.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 24 Feb 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 3; 2023: 3; 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
11 papers.
- 2022Adaptive and Robust Multi-Task Learningcited by 33
- 2022An Equivalence Between Data Poisoning and Byzantine Gradient Attackscited by 16
- 2023Towards the Theory of Unsupervised Federated Learning: Non-asymptotic Analysis of Federated EM Algorithmscited by 7
- 2023Incentivizing Honesty among Competitors in Collaborative Learning and Optimizationcited by 6
- 2022Efficient List-Decodable Regression using Batchescited by 5
- 2023Linear Regression using Heterogeneous Data Batchescited by 3
- 2024Understanding Server-Assisted Federated Learning in the Presence of Incomplete Client Participationcited by 3
- 2026When More Data Doesn't Help: Limits of Adaptation in Multitask Learningcited by 1
- 2021FLEA: Provably Robust Fair Multisource Learning from Unreliable Training Datacited by 0
- 2025GeoERM: Geometry-Aware Multi-Task Representation Learning on Riemannian Manifoldscited by 0
- 2025Robust Learnability of Sample-Compressible Distributions under Noisy or Adversarial Perturbationscited by 0
- 2026When More Data Doesn't Help: Limits of Adaptation in Multitask Learning28 Jan 2026
- 2025Robust Learnability of Sample-Compressible Distributions under Noisy or Adversarial Perturbations7 Jun 2025
- 2025GeoERM: Geometry-Aware Multi-Task Representation Learning on Riemannian Manifolds5 May 2025
- 2024Understanding Server-Assisted Federated Learning in the Presence of Incomplete Client Participation4 May 2024
- 2023Towards the Theory of Unsupervised Federated Learning: Non-asymptotic Analysis of Federated EM Algorithms23 Oct 2023
- 2023Linear Regression using Heterogeneous Data Batches5 Sep 2023
- 2023Incentivizing Honesty among Competitors in Collaborative Learning and Optimization25 May 2023
- 2022Efficient List-Decodable Regression using Batches23 Nov 2022
- 2022An Equivalence Between Data Poisoning and Byzantine Gradient Attacks17 Feb 2022
- 2022Adaptive and Robust Multi-Task Learning10 Feb 2022
- 2021FLEA: Provably Robust Fair Multisource Learning from Unreliable Training Data22 Jun 2021