mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

On the Sample Complexity of Adversarial Multi-Source PAC Learning

arXiv 2002.10384 ↗First posted 24 Feb 2020cs.LG stat.MLcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We study the problem of learning from multiple untrusted data sources, a scenario of increasing practical relevance given the recent emergence of crowdsourcing and collaborative learning paradigms. Specifically, we analyze the situation in which a learning system obtains datasets from multiple sources, some of which might be biased or even adversarially perturbed. It is known that in the single-source case, an adversary with the power to corrupt a fixed fraction of the training data can prevent PAC-learnability, that is, even in the limit of infinitely much training data, no learning system can approach the optimal test error. In this work we show that, surprisingly, the same is not true in the multi-source setting, where the adversary can arbitrarily corrupt a fixed fraction of the data sources. Our main results are a generalization bound that provides finite-sample guarantees for this learning setting, as well as corresponding lower bounds. Besides establishing PAC-learnability our results also show that in a cooperative learning setting sharing data with other parties has provable benefits, even if some participants are malicious.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 24 Feb 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 3; 2023: 3; 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

11 papers.