mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Parallel Clique Counting and Peeling Algorithms

arXiv 2002.10047 ↗First posted 24 Feb 2020cs.DS cs.DCcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We present a new parallel algorithm for k-clique counting/listing that has polylogarithmic span (parallel time) and is work-efficient (matches the work of the best sequential algorithm) for sparse graphs. Our algorithm is based on computing low out-degree orientations, which we present new linear-work and polylogarithmic-span algorithms for computing in parallel. We also present new parallel algorithms for producing unbiased estimations of clique counts using graph sparsification. Finally, we design two new parallel work-efficient algorithms for approximating the k-clique densest subgraph, the first of which is a 1/k-approximation and the second of which is a 1/(k(1+ε))-approximation and has polylogarithmic span. Our first algorithm does not have polylogarithmic span, but we prove that it solves a P-complete problem. In addition to the theoretical results, we also implement the algorithms and propose various optimizations to improve their practical performance. On a 30-core machine with two-way hyper-threading, our algorithms achieve 13.23--38.99x and 1.19--13.76x self-relative parallel speedup for k-clique counting and k-clique densest subgraph, respectively. Compared to the state-of-the-art parallel k-clique counting algorithms, we achieve up to 9.88x speedup, and compared to existing implementations of k-clique densest subgraph, we achieve up to 11.83x speedup. We are able to compute the 4-clique counts on the largest publicly-available graph with over two hundred billion edges for the first time.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 24 Feb 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 0; 2023: 1.

2 papers.