mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Computer-inspired Quantum Experiments

arXiv 2002.09970 ↗First posted 23 Feb 2020quant-ph cs.LG cs.NEcited by 18

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The design of new devices and experiments in science and engineering has historically relied on the intuitions of human experts. This credo, however, has changed. In many disciplines, computer-inspired design processes, also known as inverse-design, have augmented the capability of scientists. Here we visit different fields of physics in which computer-inspired designs are applied. We will meet vastly diverse computational approaches based on topological optimization, evolutionary strategies, deep learning, reinforcement learning or automated reasoning. Then we draw our attention specifically on quantum physics. In the quest for designing new quantum experiments, we face two challenges: First, quantum phenomena are unintuitive. Second, the number of possible configurations of quantum experiments explodes combinatorially. To overcome these challenges, physicists began to use algorithms for computer-designed quantum experiments. We focus on the most mature and textitpractical approaches that scientists used to find new complex quantum experiments, which experimentalists subsequently have realized in the laboratories. The underlying idea is a highly-efficient topological search, which allows for scientific interpretability. In that way, some of the computer-designs have led to the discovery of new scientific concepts and ideas -- demonstrating how computer algorithm can genuinely contribute to science by providing unexpected inspirations. We discuss several extensions and alternatives based on optimization and machine learning techniques, with the potential of accelerating the discovery of practical computer-inspired experiments or concepts in the future. Finally, we discuss what we can learn from the different approaches in the fields of physics, and raise several fascinating possibilities for future research.

Key facts. Cited by 18 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 23 Feb 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 5; 2022: 4; 2023: 3; 2024: 3; 2025: 3.

18 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2021Noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) algorithmscited by 79
  2. 2022SELFIES and the future of molecular string representationscited by 76
  3. 2022On scientific understanding with artificial intelligencecited by 68
  4. 2024A comprehensive review of Quantum Machine Learning: from NISQ to Fault Tolerancecited by 32
  5. 2021Learning Interpretable Representations of Entanglement in Quantum Optics Experiments using Deep Generative Modelscited by 12
  6. 2024Meta-Designing Quantum Experiments with Language Modelscited by 12
  7. 2023Learning minimal representations of stochastic processes with variational autoencoderscited by 7
  8. 2025Towards autonomous quantum physics research using LLM agents with access to intelligent toolscited by 7
  9. 2023Deep Quantum Graph Dreaming: Deciphering Neural Network Insights into Quantum Experimentscited by 5
  10. 2025Quantum computing and artificial intelligence: status and perspectivescited by 5
  11. 2022Deep reinforcement learning for quantum multiparameter estimationcited by 4
  12. 2022Reinforcement Learning Generation of 4-Qubits Entangled Statescited by 3
6 more
  1. 2021Active Learning for the Optimal Design of Multinomial Classification in Physicscited by 1
  2. 2021Design of quantum optical experiments with logic artificial intelligencecited by 1
  3. 2021SPDCinv: Inverse Quantum-Optical Design of High-Dimensional Quditscited by 0
  4. 2023Optical Quantum Sensing for Agnostic Environments via Deep Learningcited by 0
  5. 2024Virtual Reality for Understanding Artificial-Intelligence-driven Scientific Discovery with an Application in Quantum Opticscited by 0
  6. 2025Neural surrogates for designing gravitational wave detectorscited by 0