mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Addressing Some Limitations of Transformers with Feedback Memory

arXiv 2002.09402 ↗First posted 21 Feb 2020cs.LG cs.CL stat.MLcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Transformers have been successfully applied to sequential, auto-regressive tasks despite being feedforward networks. Unlike recurrent neural networks, Transformers use attention to capture temporal relations while processing input tokens in parallel. While this parallelization makes them computationally efficient, it restricts the model from fully exploiting the sequential nature of the input. The representation at a given layer can only access representations from lower layers, rather than the higher level representations already available. In this work, we propose the Feedback Transformer architecture that exposes all previous representations to all future representations, meaning the lowest representation of the current timestep is formed from the highest-level abstract representation of the past. We demonstrate on a variety of benchmarks in language modeling, machine translation, and reinforcement learning that the increased representation capacity can create small, shallow models with much stronger performance than comparable Transformers.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 21 Feb 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 2; 2025: 3; 2026: 2.

9 papers.