Addressing Some Limitations of Transformers with Feedback Memory
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Transformers have been successfully applied to sequential, auto-regressive tasks despite being feedforward networks. Unlike recurrent neural networks, Transformers use attention to capture temporal relations while processing input tokens in parallel. While this parallelization makes them computationally efficient, it restricts the model from fully exploiting the sequential nature of the input. The representation at a given layer can only access representations from lower layers, rather than the higher level representations already available. In this work, we propose the Feedback Transformer architecture that exposes all previous representations to all future representations, meaning the lowest representation of the current timestep is formed from the highest-level abstract representation of the past. We demonstrate on a variety of benchmarks in language modeling, machine translation, and reinforcement learning that the increased representation capacity can create small, shallow models with much stronger performance than comparable Transformers.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 21 Feb 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 2; 2025: 3; 2026: 2.
9 papers.
- 2025Scaling up Test-Time Compute with Latent Reasoning: A Recurrent Depth Approachcited by 415
- 2024Beyond A*: Better Planning with Transformers via Search Dynamics Bootstrappingcited by 90
- 2021When Attention Meets Fast Recurrence: Training Language Models with Reduced Computecited by 34
- 2025Finite State Automata Inside Transformers with Chain-of-Thought: A Mechanistic Study on State Trackingcited by 18
- 2024Autoregressive + Chain of Thought = Recurrent: Recurrence's Role in Language Models' Computability and a Revisit of Recurrent Transformercited by 16
- 2022Depth-Wise Attention (DWAtt): A Layer Fusion Method for Data-Efficient Classificationcited by 10
- 2025TRA: Better Length Generalisation with Threshold Relative Attentioncited by 1
- 2026Sessa: Selective State Space Attentioncited by 0
- 2026Recurrent Looped Transformercited by 0
- 2026Recurrent Looped Transformer6 Oct 2026
- 2026Sessa: Selective State Space Attention20 Apr 2026
- 2025TRA: Better Length Generalisation with Threshold Relative Attention29 Mar 2025
- 2025Finite State Automata Inside Transformers with Chain-of-Thought: A Mechanistic Study on State Tracking27 Feb 2025
- 2025Scaling up Test-Time Compute with Latent Reasoning: A Recurrent Depth Approach7 Feb 2025
- 2024Autoregressive + Chain of Thought = Recurrent: Recurrence's Role in Language Models' Computability and a Revisit of Recurrent Transformer14 Sep 2024
- 2024Beyond A*: Better Planning with Transformers via Search Dynamics Bootstrapping21 Feb 2024
- 2022Depth-Wise Attention (DWAtt): A Layer Fusion Method for Data-Efficient Classification30 Sep 2022
- 2021When Attention Meets Fast Recurrence: Training Language Models with Reduced Compute24 Feb 2021