mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Data Heterogeneity Differential Privacy: From Theory to Algorithm

arXiv 2002.08578 ↗First posted 20 Feb 2020cs.LG stat.MLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Traditionally, the random noise is equally injected when training with different data instances in the field of differential privacy (DP). In this paper, we first give sharper excess risk bounds of DP stochastic gradient descent (SGD) method. Considering most of the previous methods are under convex conditions, we use Polyak-Lojasiewicz condition to relax it in this paper. Then, after observing that different training data instances affect the machine learning model to different extent, we consider the heterogeneity of training data and attempt to improve the performance of DP-SGD from a new perspective. Specifically, by introducing the influence function (IF), we quantitatively measure the contributions of various training data on the final machine learning model. If the contribution made by a single data instance is so little that attackers cannot infer anything from the model, we do not add noise when training with it. Based on this observation, we design a `Performance Improving' DP-SGD algorithm: PIDP-SGD. Theoretical and experimental results show that our proposed PIDP-SGD improves the performance significantly.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 20 Feb 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.

1 paper.