Learning Fair Scoring Functions: Bipartite Ranking under ROC-based Fairness Constraints
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Many applications of AI involve scoring individuals using a learned function of their attributes. These predictive risk scores are then used to take decisions based on whether the score exceeds a certain threshold, which may vary depending on the context. The level of delegation granted to such systems in critical applications like credit lending and medical diagnosis will heavily depend on how questions of fairness can be answered. In this paper, we study fairness for the problem of learning scoring functions from binary labeled data, a classic learning task known as bipartite ranking. We argue that the functional nature of the ROC curve, the gold standard measure of ranking accuracy in this context, leads to several ways of formulating fairness constraints. We introduce general families of fairness definitions based on the AUC and on ROC curves, and show that our ROC-based constraints can be instantiated such that classifiers obtained by thresholding the scoring function satisfy classification fairness for a desired range of thresholds. We establish generalization bounds for scoring functions learned under such constraints, design practical learning algorithms and show the relevance our approach with numerical experiments on real and synthetic data.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 19 Feb 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 3; 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.
7 papers.
- 2022Leveraging Adversarial Examples to Quantify Membership Information Leakagecited by 19
- 2021Fairness Through Regularization for Learning to Rankcited by 8
- 2023Bipartite Ranking Fairness through a Model Agnostic Ordering Adjustmentcited by 5
- 2022SLIDE: a surrogate fairness constraint to ensure fairness consistencycited by 3
- 2022Membership Inference Attacks via Adversarial Examplescited by 2
- 2023Within-group fairness: A guidance for more sound between-group fairnesscited by 1
- 2025You Only Debias Once: Towards Flexible Accuracy-Fairness Trade-offs at Inference Timecited by 0
- 2025You Only Debias Once: Towards Flexible Accuracy-Fairness Trade-offs at Inference Time10 Mar 2025
- 2023Bipartite Ranking Fairness through a Model Agnostic Ordering Adjustment27 Jul 2023
- 2023Within-group fairness: A guidance for more sound between-group fairness20 Jan 2023
- 2022Membership Inference Attacks via Adversarial Examples27 Jul 2022
- 2022Leveraging Adversarial Examples to Quantify Membership Information Leakage17 Mar 2022
- 2022SLIDE: a surrogate fairness constraint to ensure fairness consistency7 Feb 2022
- 2021Fairness Through Regularization for Learning to Rank11 Feb 2021