Ensemble Deep Learning on Large, Mixed-Site fMRI Datasets in Autism and Other Tasks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deep learning models for MRI classification face two recurring problems: they are typically limited by low sample size, and are abstracted by their own complexity (the "black box problem"). In this paper, we train a convolutional neural network (CNN) with the largest multi-source, functional MRI (fMRI) connectomic dataset ever compiled, consisting of 43,858 datapoints. We apply this model to a cross-sectional comparison of autism (ASD) vs typically developing (TD) controls that has proved difficult to characterise with inferential statistics. To contextualise these findings, we additionally perform classifications of gender and task vs rest. Employing class-balancing to build a training set, we trained 3×300 modified CNNs in an ensemble model to classify fMRI connectivity matrices with overall AUROCs of 0.6774, 0.7680, and 0.9222 for ASD vs TD, gender, and task vs rest, respectively. Additionally, we aim to address the black box problem in this context using two visualization methods. First, class activation maps show which functional connections of the brain our models focus on when performing classification. Second, by analyzing maximal activations of the hidden layers, we were also able to explore how the model organizes a large and mixed-centre dataset, finding that it dedicates specific areas of its hidden layers to processing different covariates of data (depending on the independent variable analyzed), and other areas to mix data from different sources. Our study finds that deep learning models that distinguish ASD from TD controls focus broadly on temporal and cerebellar connections, with a particularly high focus on the right caudate nucleus and paracentral sulcus.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 14 Feb 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 3; 2023: 1; 2024: 2.
7 papers.
- 2024Is K-fold cross validation the best model selection method for Machine Learning?cited by 10
- 2022Automatic autism spectrum disorder detection using artificial intelligence methods with MRI neuroimaging: A reviewcited by 8
- 2022Interpretability of Machine Learning Methods Applied to Neuroimagingcited by 4
- 2022A hypothesis-driven method based on machine learning for neuroimaging data analysiscited by 2
- 2021MIASSR: An Approach for Medical Image Arbitrary Scale Super-Resolutioncited by 1
- 2023A residual dense vision transformer for medical image super-resolution with segmentation-based perceptual loss fine-tuningcited by 1
- 2024Combining Radiomics and Machine Learning Approaches for Objective ASD Diagnosis: Verifying White Matter Associations with ASDcited by 0
- 2024Combining Radiomics and Machine Learning Approaches for Objective ASD Diagnosis: Verifying White Matter Associations with ASD25 May 2024
- 2024Is K-fold cross validation the best model selection method for Machine Learning?29 Jan 2024
- 2023A residual dense vision transformer for medical image super-resolution with segmentation-based perceptual loss fine-tuning22 Feb 2023
- 2022Automatic autism spectrum disorder detection using artificial intelligence methods with MRI neuroimaging: A review20 Jun 2022
- 2022Interpretability of Machine Learning Methods Applied to Neuroimaging14 Apr 2022
- 2022A hypothesis-driven method based on machine learning for neuroimaging data analysis9 Feb 2022
- 2021MIASSR: An Approach for Medical Image Arbitrary Scale Super-Resolution22 May 2021