Learning the Stein Discrepancy for Training and Evaluating Energy-Based Models without Sampling
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We present a new method for evaluating and training unnormalized density models. Our approach only requires access to the gradient of the unnormalized model's log-density. We estimate the Stein discrepancy between the data density p(x) and the model density q(x) defined by a vector function of the data. We parameterize this function with a neural network and fit its parameters to maximize the discrepancy. This yields a novel goodness-of-fit test which outperforms existing methods on high dimensional data. Furthermore, optimizing q(x) to minimize this discrepancy produces a novel method for training unnormalized models which scales more gracefully than existing methods. The ability to both learn and compare models is a unique feature of the proposed method.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 13 Feb 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 2; 2023: 0; 2024: 1.
6 papers.
- 2022Diffusion Models: A Comprehensive Survey of Methods and Applicationscited by 1,114
- 2021How to Train Your Energy-Based Modelscited by 274
- 2024Learning Iterative Reasoning through Energy Diffusioncited by 36
- 2022Learning Iterative Reasoning through Energy Minimizationcited by 32
- 2021Active Slices for Sliced Stein Discrepancycited by 3
- 2021Adversarial Stein Training for Graph Energy Modelscited by 0
- 2024Learning Iterative Reasoning through Energy Diffusion17 Jun 2024
- 2022Diffusion Models: A Comprehensive Survey of Methods and Applications2 Sep 2022
- 2022Learning Iterative Reasoning through Energy Minimization30 Jun 2022
- 2021Adversarial Stein Training for Graph Energy Models30 Aug 2021
- 2021Active Slices for Sliced Stein Discrepancy5 Feb 2021
- 2021How to Train Your Energy-Based Models9 Jan 2021