mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Hierarchy of Limitations in Machine Learning

arXiv 2002.05193 ↗First posted 12 Feb 2020cs.CY cs.LG econ.EMcited by 19

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

"All models are wrong, but some are useful", wrote George E. P. Box (1979). Machine learning has focused on the usefulness of probability models for prediction in social systems, but is only now coming to grips with the ways in which these models are wrong---and the consequences of those shortcomings. This paper attempts a comprehensive, structured overview of the specific conceptual, procedural, and statistical limitations of models in machine learning when applied to society. Machine learning modelers themselves can use the described hierarchy to identify possible failure points and think through how to address them, and consumers of machine learning models can know what to question when confronted with the decision about if, where, and how to apply machine learning. The limitations go from commitments inherent in quantification itself, through to showing how unmodeled dependencies can lead to cross-validation being overly optimistic as a way of assessing model performance.

Key facts. Cited by 19 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 12 Feb 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 4; 2022: 4; 2023: 3; 2024: 3; 2025: 5.

19 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2021AI and the Everything in the Whole Wide World Benchmarkcited by 340
  2. 2022Leakage and the Reproducibility Crisis in ML-based Sciencecited by 63
  3. 2021How to avoid machine learning pitfalls: a guide for academic researcherscited by 34
  4. 2022Rethinking Fairness: An Interdisciplinary Survey of Critiques of Hegemonic ML Fairness Approachescited by 23
  5. 2024Scalable Qualitative Coding with LLMs: Chain-of-Thought Reasoning Matches Human Performance in Some Hermeneutic Taskscited by 22
  6. 2022The worst of both worlds: A comparative analysis of errors in learning from data in psychology and machine learningcited by 17
  7. 2023REFORMS: Reporting Standards for Machine Learning Based Sciencecited by 13
  8. 2025Rigor in AI: Doing Rigorous AI Work Requires a Broader, Responsible AI-Informed Conception of Rigorcited by 7
  9. 2021Limitations of machine learning for building energy prediction: ASHRAE Great Energy Predictor III Kaggle competition error analysiscited by 5
  10. 2021Mapping the Internet: Modelling Entity Interactions in Complex Heterogeneous Networkscited by 3
  11. 2022System Safety Engineering for Social and Ethical ML Risks: A Case Studycited by 2
  12. 2023Concrete Safety for ML Problems: System Safety for ML Development and Assessmentcited by 2
7 more
  1. 2024Specification Overfitting in Artificial Intelligencecited by 2
  2. 2025Talking About the Assumption in the Roomcited by 2
  3. 2023Tackling Cyberattacks through AI-based Reactive Systems: A Holistic Review and Future Visioncited by 1
  4. 2024Exposing Assumptions in AI Benchmarks through Cognitive Modellingcited by 0
  5. 2025Combining Self-attention and Dilation Convolutional for Semantic Segmentation of Coal Maceral Groupscited by 0
  6. 2025Adaptive Physics-Informed Neural Networks with Multi-Category Feature Engineering for Hydrogen Sorption Prediction in Clays, Shales, and Coalscited by 0
  7. 2025Every Character Counts: From Vulnerability to Defense in Phishing Detectioncited by 0