Phylogenetic signal in phonotactics
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Phylogenetic methods have broad potential in linguistics beyond tree inference. Here, we show how a phylogenetic approach opens the possibility of gaining historical insights from entirely new kinds of linguistic data--in this instance, statistical phonotactics. We extract phonotactic data from 111 Pama-Nyungan vocabularies and apply tests for phylogenetic signal, quantifying the degree to which the data reflect phylogenetic history. We test three datasets: (1) binary variables recording the presence or absence of biphones (two-segment sequences) in a lexicon (2) frequencies of transitions between segments, and (3) frequencies of transitions between natural sound classes. Australian languages have been characterized as having a high degree of phonotactic homogeneity. Nevertheless, we detect phylogenetic signal in all datasets. Phylogenetic signal is greater in finer-grained frequency data than in binary data, and greatest in natural-class-based data. These results demonstrate the viability of employing a new source of readily extractable data in historical and comparative linguistics.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 3 Feb 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 1.
3 papers.
- 2023Multiple evolutionary pressures shape identical consonant avoidance in the world's languagescited by 1
- 2021Evolution and trade-off dynamics of functional loadcited by 0
- 2022Challenges of sampling and how phylogenetic comparative methods help: With a case study of the Pama-Nyungan laminal contrastcited by 0
- 2023Multiple evolutionary pressures shape identical consonant avoidance in the world's languages25 Sep 2023
- 2022Challenges of sampling and how phylogenetic comparative methods help: With a case study of the Pama-Nyungan laminal contrast1 Jan 2022
- 2021Evolution and trade-off dynamics of functional load22 Dec 2021