mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Tiny noise, big mistakes: Adversarial perturbations induce errors in Brain-Computer Interface spellers

arXiv 2001.11569 ↗First posted 30 Jan 2020cs.HC cs.LG eess.SPcited by 14

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

An electroencephalogram (EEG) based brain-computer interface (BCI) speller allows a user to input text to a computer by thought. It is particularly useful to severely disabled individuals, e.g., amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients, who have no other effective means of communication with another person or a computer. Most studies so far focused on making EEG-based BCI spellers faster and more reliable; however, few have considered their security. This study, for the first time, shows that P300 and steady-state visual evoked potential BCI spellers are very vulnerable, i.e., they can be severely attacked by adversarial perturbations, which are too tiny to be noticed when added to EEG signals, but can mislead the spellers to spell anything the attacker wants. The consequence could range from merely user frustration to severe misdiagnosis in clinical applications. We hope our research can attract more attention to the security of EEG-based BCI spellers, and more broadly, EEG-based BCIs, which has received little attention before.

Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 30 Jan 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 3; 2023: 2; 2024: 5; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

14 papers.

Sort: