Multi-class Gaussian Process Classification with Noisy Inputs
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
It is a common practice in the machine learning community to assume that the observed data are noise-free in the input attributes. Nevertheless, scenarios with input noise are common in real problems, as measurements are never perfectly accurate. If this input noise is not taken into account, a supervised machine learning method is expected to perform sub-optimally. In this paper, we focus on multi-class classification problems and use Gaussian processes (GPs) as the underlying classifier. Motivated by a data set coming from the astrophysics domain, we hypothesize that the observed data may contain noise in the inputs. Therefore, we devise several multi-class GP classifiers that can account for input noise. Such classifiers can be efficiently trained using variational inference to approximate the posterior distribution of the latent variables of the model. Moreover, in some situations, the amount of noise can be known before-hand. If this is the case, it can be readily introduced in the proposed methods. This prior information is expected to lead to better performance results. We have evaluated the proposed methods by carrying out several experiments, involving synthetic and real data. These include several data sets from the UCI repository, the MNIST data set and a data set coming from astrophysics. The results obtained show that, although the classification error is similar across methods, the predictive distribution of the proposed methods is better, in terms of the test log-likelihood, than the predictive distribution of a classifier based on GPs that ignores input noise.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 28 Jan 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.
10 papers.
- 2021Personalized Federated Learning with Gaussian Processescited by 76
- 2022Multi-Instance Partial-Label Learning: Towards Exploiting Dual Inexact Supervisioncited by 8
- 2024Physics-Informed Variational State-Space Gaussian Processescited by 7
- 2021Input Dependent Sparse Gaussian Processescited by 5
- 2022Gaussian Processes for Missing Value Imputationcited by 5
- 2021The information of attribute uncertainties: what convolutional neural networks can learn about errors in input datacited by 4
- 2023A Novel Hybrid Ordinal Learning Model with Health Care Applicationcited by 2
- 2024Prediction of Acoustic Communication Performance for AUVs using Gaussian Process Classificationcited by 1
- 2026Computationally lightweight classifiers with frequentist bounds on predictionscited by 1
- 2026Simplex-to-Euclidean Bijection for Conjugate and Calibrated Multiclass Gaussian Process Classificationcited by 0
- 2026Computationally lightweight classifiers with frequentist bounds on predictions23 Mar 2026
- 2026Simplex-to-Euclidean Bijection for Conjugate and Calibrated Multiclass Gaussian Process Classification17 Mar 2026
- 2024Prediction of Acoustic Communication Performance for AUVs using Gaussian Process Classification12 Nov 2024
- 2024Physics-Informed Variational State-Space Gaussian Processes20 Sep 2024
- 2023A Novel Hybrid Ordinal Learning Model with Health Care Application15 Dec 2023
- 2022Multi-Instance Partial-Label Learning: Towards Exploiting Dual Inexact Supervision18 Dec 2022
- 2022Gaussian Processes for Missing Value Imputation10 Apr 2022
- 2021The information of attribute uncertainties: what convolutional neural networks can learn about errors in input data10 Aug 2021
- 2021Input Dependent Sparse Gaussian Processes15 Jul 2021
- 2021Personalized Federated Learning with Gaussian Processes29 Jun 2021