Manipulating Deformable Objects by Interleaving Prediction, Planning, and Control
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We present a framework for deformable object manipulation that interleaves planning and control, enabling complex manipulation tasks without relying on high-fidelity modeling or simulation. The key question we address is when should we use planning and when should we use control to achieve the task? Planners are designed to find paths through complex configuration spaces, but for highly underactuated systems, such as deformable objects, achieving a specific configuration is very difficult even with high-fidelity models. Conversely, controllers can be designed to achieve specific configurations, but they can be trapped in undesirable local minima due to obstacles. Our approach consists of three components: (1) A global motion planner to generate gross motion of the deformable object; (2) A local controller for refinement of the configuration of the deformable object; and (3) A novel deadlock prediction algorithm to determine when to use planning versus control. By separating planning from control we are able to use different representations of the deformable object, reducing overall complexity and enabling efficient computation of motion. We provide a detailed proof of probabilistic completeness for our planner, which is valid despite the fact that our system is underactuated and we do not have a steering function. We then demonstrate that our framework is able to successfully perform several manipulation tasks with rope and cloth in simulation which cannot be performed using either our controller or planner alone. These experiments suggest that our planner can generate paths efficiently, taking under a second on average to find a feasible path in three out of four scenarios. We also show that our framework is effective on a 16 DoF physical robot, where reachability and dual-arm constraints make the planning more difficult.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 27 Jan 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 3; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
8 papers.
- 2022Contact Points Discovery for Soft-Body Manipulations with Differentiable Physicscited by 14
- 2023Deep Reinforcement Learning Based on Local GNN for Goal-conditioned Deformable Object Rearrangingcited by 6
- 2024Differentiable Physics-based System Identification for Robotic Manipulation of Elastoplastic Materialscited by 6
- 2026Robustness without Wrinkles: Parallel Simulation and Robust MPC for Certified Deformable Manipulationcited by 3
- 2023Graph-Transporter: A Graph-based Learning Method for Goal-Conditioned Deformable Object Rearranging Taskcited by 2
- 2022Robotic Dough Shapingcited by 1
- 2025Certifiably Safe Manipulation of Deformable Linear Objects via Joint Shape and Tension Predictioncited by 1
- 2023Co-manipulation of soft-materials estimating deformation from depth imagescited by 0
- 2026Robustness without Wrinkles: Parallel Simulation and Robust MPC for Certified Deformable Manipulation12 Jun 2026
- 2025Certifiably Safe Manipulation of Deformable Linear Objects via Joint Shape and Tension Prediction20 May 2025
- 2024Differentiable Physics-based System Identification for Robotic Manipulation of Elastoplastic Materials1 Nov 2024
- 2023Deep Reinforcement Learning Based on Local GNN for Goal-conditioned Deformable Object Rearranging21 Feb 2023
- 2023Graph-Transporter: A Graph-based Learning Method for Goal-Conditioned Deformable Object Rearranging Task21 Feb 2023
- 2023Co-manipulation of soft-materials estimating deformation from depth images13 Jan 2023
- 2022Robotic Dough Shaping31 Jul 2022
- 2022Contact Points Discovery for Soft-Body Manipulations with Differentiable Physics5 May 2022