Artificial Artificial Intelligence: Measuring Influence of AI 'Assessments' on Moral Decision-Making
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Given AI's growing role in modeling and improving decision-making, how and when to present users with feedback is an urgent topic to address. We empirically examined the effect of feedback from false AI on moral decision-making about donor kidney allocation. We found some evidence that judgments about whether a patient should receive a kidney can be influenced by feedback about participants' own decision-making perceived to be given by AI, even if the feedback is entirely random. We also discovered different effects between assessments presented as being from human experts and assessments presented as being from AI.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 13 Jan 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 1.
4 papers.
- 2025Synthetic Socratic Debates: Examining Persona Effects on Moral Decision and Persuasion Dynamicscited by 19
- 2024On The Stability of Moral Preferences: A Problem with Computational Elicitation Methodscited by 7
- 2023Who's Thinking? A Push for Human-Centered Evaluation of LLMs using the XAI Playbookcited by 5
- 2024Why should we ever automate moral decision making?cited by 0
- 2025Synthetic Socratic Debates: Examining Persona Effects on Moral Decision and Persuasion Dynamics14 Jun 2025
- 2024On The Stability of Moral Preferences: A Problem with Computational Elicitation Methods5 Aug 2024
- 2024Why should we ever automate moral decision making?10 Jul 2024
- 2023Who's Thinking? A Push for Human-Centered Evaluation of LLMs using the XAI Playbook10 Mar 2023