mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

On the computational power and complexity of Spiking Neural Networks

arXiv 2001.08439 ↗First posted 23 Jan 2020cs.CC cs.NEcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The last decade has seen the rise of neuromorphic architectures based on artificial spiking neural networks, such as the SpiNNaker, TrueNorth, and Loihi systems. The massive parallelism and co-locating of computation and memory in these architectures potentially allows for an energy usage that is orders of magnitude lower compared to traditional Von Neumann architectures. However, to date a comparison with more traditional computational architectures (particularly with respect to energy usage) is hampered by the lack of a formal machine model and a computational complexity theory for neuromorphic computation. In this paper we take the first steps towards such a theory. We introduce spiking neural networks as a machine model where---in contrast to the familiar Turing machine---information and the manipulation thereof are co-located in the machine. We introduce canonical problems, define hierarchies of complexity classes and provide some first completeness results.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 23 Jan 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 0; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.

3 papers.