mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Algorithms for Tensor Network Contraction Ordering

arXiv 2001.08063 ↗First posted 15 Jan 2020cs.NE cs.NA math.NAcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Contracting tensor networks is often computationally demanding. Well-designed contraction sequences can dramatically reduce the contraction cost. We explore the performance of simulated annealing and genetic algorithms, two common discrete optimization techniques, to this ordering problem. We benchmark their performance as well as that of the commonly-used greedy search on physically relevant tensor networks. Where computationally feasible, we also compare them with the optimal contraction sequence obtained by an exhaustive search. We find that the algorithms we consider consistently outperform a greedy search given equal computational resources, with an advantage that scales with tensor network size. We compare the obtained contraction sequences and identify signs of highly non-local optimization, with the more sophisticated algorithms sacrificing run-time early in the contraction for better overall performance.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 15 Jan 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

3 papers.