Algorithms for Tensor Network Contraction Ordering
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Contracting tensor networks is often computationally demanding. Well-designed contraction sequences can dramatically reduce the contraction cost. We explore the performance of simulated annealing and genetic algorithms, two common discrete optimization techniques, to this ordering problem. We benchmark their performance as well as that of the commonly-used greedy search on physically relevant tensor networks. Where computationally feasible, we also compare them with the optimal contraction sequence obtained by an exhaustive search. We find that the algorithms we consider consistently outperform a greedy search given equal computational resources, with an advantage that scales with tensor network size. We compare the obtained contraction sequences and identify signs of highly non-local optimization, with the more sophisticated algorithms sacrificing run-time early in the contraction for better overall performance.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 15 Jan 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
3 papers.
- 2022Optimizing Tensor Network Contraction Using Reinforcement Learningcited by 5
- 2023Interaction Measures, Partition Lattices and Kernel Tests for High-Order Interactionscited by 3
- 2026Algorithmic algorithm development with LLMs: A Case Study on LLM-Usage for Contraction Order Optimization in Tensor Networkscited by 0
- 2026Algorithmic algorithm development with LLMs: A Case Study on LLM-Usage for Contraction Order Optimization in Tensor Networks1 Jun 2026
- 2023Interaction Measures, Partition Lattices and Kernel Tests for High-Order Interactions1 Jun 2023
- 2022Optimizing Tensor Network Contraction Using Reinforcement Learning18 Apr 2022