mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

R2DE: a NLP approach to estimating IRT parameters of newly generated questions

arXiv 2001.07569 ↗First posted 21 Jan 2020cs.LG cs.CL stat.MLcited by 15

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The main objective of exams consists in performing an assessment of students' expertise on a specific subject. Such expertise, also referred to as skill or knowledge level, can then be leveraged in different ways (e.g., to assign a grade to the students, to understand whether a student might need some support, etc.). Similarly, the questions appearing in the exams have to be assessed in some way before being used to evaluate students. Standard approaches to questions' assessment are either subjective (e.g., assessment by human experts) or introduce a long delay in the process of question generation (e.g., pretesting with real students). In this work we introduce R2DE (which is a Regressor for Difficulty and Discrimination Estimation), a model capable of assessing newly generated multiple-choice questions by looking at the text of the question and the text of the possible choices. In particular, it can estimate the difficulty and the discrimination of each question, as they are defined in Item Response Theory. We also present the results of extensive experiments we carried out on a real world large scale dataset coming from an e-learning platform, showing that our model can be used to perform an initial assessment of newly created questions and ease some of the problems that arise in question generation.

Key facts. Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 21 Jan 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 3; 2024: 0; 2025: 2; 2026: 8.

15 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2025How to Select Datapoints for Efficient Human Evaluation of NLG Models?cited by 23
  2. 2025Reasoning and Sampling-Augmented MCQ Difficulty Prediction via LLMscited by 14
  3. 2023A quantitative study of NLP approaches to question difficulty estimationcited by 13
  4. 2023Towards a Holistic Understanding of Mathematical Questions with Contrastive Pre-trainingcited by 5
  5. 2023Proactive and Reactive Engagement of Artificial Intelligence Methods for Education: A Reviewcited by 5
  6. 2026From Text to Parameters: Predicting Item Parameters from Embedding Regularization with Reliability and Design Ceilingscited by 2
  7. 2021Building a Question and Answer System for News Domaincited by 1
  8. 2026Synthetic Student Responses: LLM-Extracted Features for IRT Difficulty Parameter Estimationcited by 1
  9. 2026Estimating Item Difficulty with Large Language Models as Expertscited by 1
  10. 2022Transferable Student Performance Modeling for Intelligent Tutoring Systemscited by 0
  11. 2026Response-free item difficulty modelling for multiple-choice items with fine-tuned transformers: Component-wise representation and multi-task learningcited by 0
  12. 2026Structure-Aware Modeling of Multiple-Choice Questions Improves Automatic Difficulty Estimationcited by 0
3 more
  1. 2026Automated item evaluation: Predicting item acceptance and rejection using LLM-generated critiquescited by 0
  2. 2026Evaluation of pre-trained models for pedagogical assessment of novel AI-assisted educational questionscited by 0
  3. 2026What Makes Something Hard(er)? Explaining Question Difficulty in Natural Languagecited by 0