Correcting Knowledge Base Assertions
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The usefulness and usability of knowledge bases (KBs) is often limited by quality issues. One common issue is the presence of erroneous assertions, often caused by lexical or semantic confusion. We study the problem of correcting such assertions, and present a general correction framework which combines lexical matching, semantic embedding, soft constraint mining and semantic consistency checking. The framework is evaluated using DBpedia and an enterprise medical KB.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 19 Jan 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 0; 2023: 1; 2024: 1.
4 papers.
- 2021Unsupervised Knowledge Graph Alignment by Probabilistic Reasoning and Semantic Embeddingcited by 18
- 2024COLEP: Certifiably Robust Learning-Reasoning Conformal Prediction via Probabilistic Circuitscited by 9
- 2021PRASEMap: A Probabilistic Reasoning and Semantic Embedding based Knowledge Graph Alignment Systemcited by 1
- 2023Explaining ELH Concept Descriptions through Counterfactual Reasoningcited by 0
- 2024COLEP: Certifiably Robust Learning-Reasoning Conformal Prediction via Probabilistic Circuits17 Mar 2024
- 2023Explaining ELH Concept Descriptions through Counterfactual Reasoning12 Jan 2023
- 2021PRASEMap: A Probabilistic Reasoning and Semantic Embedding based Knowledge Graph Alignment System16 Jun 2021
- 2021Unsupervised Knowledge Graph Alignment by Probabilistic Reasoning and Semantic Embedding12 May 2021