A Comparative Study for Non-rigid Image Registration and Rigid Image Registration
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Image registration algorithms can be generally categorized into two groups: non-rigid and rigid. Recently, many deep learning-based algorithms employ a neural net to characterize non-rigid image registration function. However, do they always perform better? In this study, we compare the state-of-art deep learning-based non-rigid registration approach with rigid registration approach. The data is generated from Kaggle Dog vs Cat Competition urlhttps://www.kaggle.com/c/dogs-vs-cats/ and we test the algorithms' performance on rigid transformation including translation, rotation, scaling, shearing and pixelwise non-rigid transformation. The Voxelmorph is trained on rigidset and nonrigidset separately for comparison and we also add a gaussian blur layer to its original architecture to improve registration performance. The best quantitative results in both root-mean-square error (RMSE) and mean absolute error (MAE) metrics for rigid registration are produced by SimpleElastix and non-rigid registration by Voxelmorph. We select representative samples for visual assessment.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 12 Jan 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2.
2 papers.