mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Attenuation Coefficient Estimation for PET/MRI With Bayesian Deep Learning pseudo-CT and Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Activity and Attenuation

arXiv 2001.03414 ↗First posted 10 Jan 2020physics.med-ph eess.IVcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

A major remaining challenge for magnetic resonance-based attenuation correction methods (MRAC) is their susceptibility to sources of MRI artifacts (e.g. implants, motion) and uncertainties due to the limitations of MRI contrast (e.g. accurate bone delineation and density, and separation of air/bone). We propose using a Bayesian deep convolutional neural network that, in addition to generating an initial pseudo-CT from MR data, also produces uncertainty estimates of the pseudo-CT to quantify the limitations of the MR data. These outputs are combined with MLAA reconstruction that uses the PET emission data to improve the attenuation maps. With the proposed approach (UpCT-MLAA), we demonstrate accurate estimation of PET uptake in pelvic lesions and show recovery of metal implants. In patients without implants, UpCT-MLAA had acceptable but slightly higher RMSE than Zero-echo-time and Dixon Deep pseudo-CT when compared to CTAC. In patients with metal implants, MLAA recovered the metal implant; however, anatomy outside the implant region was obscured by noise and crosstalk artifacts. Attenuation coefficients from the pseudo-CT from Dixon MRI were accurate in normal anatomy; however, the metal implant region was estimated to have attenuation coefficients of air. UpCT-MLAA estimated attenuation coefficients of metal implants alongside accurate anatomic depiction outside of implant regions.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 10 Jan 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 1.

3 papers.