LTP: A New Active Learning Strategy for CRF-Based Named Entity Recognition
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In recent years, deep learning has achieved great success in many natural language processing tasks including named entity recognition. The shortcoming is that a large amount of manually-annotated data is usually required. Previous studies have demonstrated that active learning could elaborately reduce the cost of data annotation, but there is still plenty of room for improvement. In real applications we found existing uncertainty-based active learning strategies have two shortcomings. Firstly, these strategies prefer to choose long sequence explicitly or implicitly, which increase the annotation burden of annotators. Secondly, some strategies need to invade the model and modify to generate some additional information for sample selection, which will increase the workload of the developer and increase the training/prediction time of the model. In this paper, we first examine traditional active learning strategies in a specific case of BiLstm-CRF that has widely used in named entity recognition on several typical datasets. Then we propose an uncertainty-based active learning strategy called Lowest Token Probability (LTP) which combines the input and output of CRF to select informative instance. LTP is simple and powerful strategy that does not favor long sequences and does not need to invade the model. We test LTP on multiple datasets, and the experiments show that LTP performs slightly better than traditional strategies with obviously less annotation tokens on both sentence-level accuracy and entity-level F1-score. Related code have been release on https://github.com/HIT-ICES/AL-NER
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 8 Jan 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 4; 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
10 papers.
- 2021Should We Trust This Summary? Bayesian Abstractive Summarization to The Rescuecited by 11
- 2022Multilingual Detection of Personal Employment Status on Twittercited by 8
- 2021Improving Question Answering Performance Using Knowledge Distillation and Active Learningcited by 6
- 2021Bayesian Active Summarizationcited by 5
- 2025DUAL: Diversity and Uncertainty Active Learning for Text Summarizationcited by 3
- 2024In-Context Learning on a Budget: A Case Study in Token Classificationcited by 2
- 2021Active Learning for Argument Mining: A Practical Approachcited by 0
- 2023Cross-lingual German Biomedical Information Extraction: from Zero-shot to Human-in-the-Loopcited by 0
- 2023Perturbation-based Active Learning for Question Answeringcited by 0
- 2026When Active Learning Falls Short: An Empirical Study on Chemical Reaction Extractioncited by 0
- 2026When Active Learning Falls Short: An Empirical Study on Chemical Reaction Extraction21 Apr 2026
- 2025DUAL: Diversity and Uncertainty Active Learning for Text Summarization2 Mar 2025
- 2024In-Context Learning on a Budget: A Case Study in Token Classification19 Jun 2024
- 2023Perturbation-based Active Learning for Question Answering4 Nov 2023
- 2023Cross-lingual German Biomedical Information Extraction: from Zero-shot to Human-in-the-Loop24 Jan 2023
- 2022Multilingual Detection of Personal Employment Status on Twitter17 Mar 2022
- 2021Bayesian Active Summarization9 Oct 2021
- 2021Active Learning for Argument Mining: A Practical Approach28 Sep 2021
- 2021Improving Question Answering Performance Using Knowledge Distillation and Active Learning26 Sep 2021
- 2021Should We Trust This Summary? Bayesian Abstractive Summarization to The Rescue21 May 2021