Resilient Multi-Dimensional Consensus in Adversarial Environment
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper considers the multi-dimensional consensus in networked systems, where some of the agents might be misbehaving (or faulty). Despite the influence of these misbehaviors, the benign agents aim to reach an agreement while avoiding being seriously influenced by the faulty ones. To this end, this paper first considers a general class of consensus algorithms, where each benign agent computes an "auxiliary point" based on the received values and moves its state toward this point. Concerning this generic form, we present conditions for achieving resilient consensus and obtain a lower bound on the exponential convergence rate. Assuming that the number of malicious agents is upper bounded, two specific resilient consensus algorithms are further developed based on the obtained conditions. Particularly, the first solution, based on Helly's Theorem, achieves the consensus within the convex hull formed by the benign agents' initial states, where the auxiliary point can be efficiently computed through linear programming. On the other hand, the second algorithm serves as a "built-in" security guarantee for standard average consensus algorithms, in the sense that its performance coincides exactly with that of the standard ones in the absence of faulty nodes while also resisting the serious influence of the misbehaving ones in adversarial environment. Some numerical examples are provided in the end to verify the theoretical results.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 3 Jan 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.
4 papers.
- 2023On the Tradeoff between Privacy Preservation and Byzantine-Robustness in Decentralized Learningcited by 8
- 2024A survey on secure decentralized optimization and learningcited by 4
- 2022A Survey on Distributed Online Optimization and Gamecited by 1
- 2025ImprovDML: Improved Trade-off in Private Byzantine-Resilient Distributed Machine Learningcited by 0
- 2025ImprovDML: Improved Trade-off in Private Byzantine-Resilient Distributed Machine Learning18 Jun 2025
- 2024A survey on secure decentralized optimization and learning16 Aug 2024
- 2023On the Tradeoff between Privacy Preservation and Byzantine-Robustness in Decentralized Learning28 Aug 2023
- 2022A Survey on Distributed Online Optimization and Game1 May 2022