mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

The Offense-Defense Balance of Scientific Knowledge: Does Publishing AI Research Reduce Misuse?

arXiv 2001.00463 ↗First posted 27 Dec 2019cs.CY cs.AIcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

There is growing concern over the potential misuse of artificial intelligence (AI) research. Publishing scientific research can facilitate misuse of the technology, but the research can also contribute to protections against misuse. This paper addresses the balance between these two effects. Our theoretical framework elucidates the factors governing whether the published research will be more useful for attackers or defenders, such as the possibility for adequate defensive measures, or the independent discovery of the knowledge outside of the scientific community. The balance will vary across scientific fields. However, we show that the existing conversation within AI has imported concepts and conclusions from prior debates within computer security over the disclosure of software vulnerabilities. While disclosure of software vulnerabilities often favours defence, this cannot be assumed for AI research. The AI research community should consider concepts and policies from a broad set of adjacent fields, and ultimately needs to craft policy well-suited to its particular challenges.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 27 Dec 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 0; 2023: 6; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

12 papers.