Metamorphic Testing for Object Detection Systems
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent advances in deep neural networks (DNNs) have led to object detectors that can rapidly process pictures or videos, and recognize the objects that they contain. Despite the promising progress by industrial manufacturers such as Amazon and Google in commercializing deep learning-based object detection as a standard computer vision service, object detection systems - similar to traditional software - may still produce incorrect results. These errors, in turn, can lead to severe negative outcomes for the users of these object detection systems. For instance, an autonomous driving system that fails to detect pedestrians can cause accidents or even fatalities. However, principled, systematic methods for testing object detection systems do not yet exist, despite their importance. To fill this critical gap, we introduce the design and realization of MetaOD, the first metamorphic testing system for object detectors to effectively reveal erroneous detection results by commercial object detectors. To this end, we (1) synthesize natural-looking images by inserting extra object instances into background images, and (2) design metamorphic conditions asserting the equivalence of object detection results between the original and synthetic images after excluding the prediction results on the inserted objects. MetaOD is designed as a streamlined workflow that performs object extraction, selection, and insertion. Evaluated on four commercial object detection services and four pretrained models provided by the TensorFlow API, MetaOD found tens of thousands of detection defects in these object detectors. To further demonstrate the practical usage of MetaOD, we use the synthetic images that cause erroneous detection results to retrain the model. Our results show that the model performance is increased significantly, from an mAP score of 9.3 to an mAP score of 10.5.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 19 Dec 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
6 papers.
- 2021A Survey on Scenario-Based Testing for Automated Driving Systems in High-Fidelity Simulationcited by 21
- 2021Robustness Evaluation of Stacked Generative Adversarial Networks using Metamorphic Testingcited by 3
- 2021Few-Shot Learning for Image Classification of Common Floracited by 0
- 2022Butterfly Effect Attack: Tiny and Seemingly Unrelated Perturbations for Object Detectioncited by 0
- 2023Evaluating Supervision Levels Trade-Offs for Infrared-Based People Countingcited by 0
- 2026Real-World Perturbation Testing of Autonomous Driving Systemscited by 0
- 2026Real-World Perturbation Testing of Autonomous Driving Systems6 Jul 2026
- 2023Evaluating Supervision Levels Trade-Offs for Infrared-Based People Counting20 Nov 2023
- 2022Butterfly Effect Attack: Tiny and Seemingly Unrelated Perturbations for Object Detection14 Nov 2022
- 2021A Survey on Scenario-Based Testing for Automated Driving Systems in High-Fidelity Simulation2 Dec 2021
- 2021Few-Shot Learning for Image Classification of Common Flora7 May 2021
- 2021Robustness Evaluation of Stacked Generative Adversarial Networks using Metamorphic Testing4 Mar 2021