Minimal Solutions for Relative Pose with a Single Affine Correspondence
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In this paper we present four cases of minimal solutions for two-view relative pose estimation by exploiting the affine transformation between feature points and we demonstrate efficient solvers for these cases. It is shown, that under the planar motion assumption or with knowledge of a vertical direction, a single affine correspondence is sufficient to recover the relative camera pose. The four cases considered are two-view planar relative motion for calibrated cameras as a closed-form and a least-squares solution, a closed-form solution for unknown focal length and the case of a known vertical direction. These algorithms can be used efficiently for outlier detection within a RANSAC loop and for initial motion estimation. All the methods are evaluated on both synthetic data and real-world datasets from the KITTI benchmark. The experimental results demonstrate that our methods outperform comparable state-of-the-art methods in accuracy with the benefit of a reduced number of needed RANSAC iterations.
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 23 Dec 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 2; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 4; 2026: 3.
12 papers.
- 2022DKM: Dense Kernelized Feature Matching for Geometry Estimationcited by 177
- 2025STAA-SNN: Spatial-Temporal Attention Aggregator for Spiking Neural Networkscited by 11
- 2021Fusing the Old with the New: Learning Relative Camera Pose with Geometry-Guided Uncertaintycited by 9
- 2025TS-SNN: Temporal Shift Module for Spiking Neural Networkscited by 5
- 2022E-Graph: Minimal Solution for Rigid Rotation with Extensibility Graphscited by 4
- 2021Trust Your IMU: Consequences of Ignoring the IMU Driftcited by 3
- 2021On Relative Pose Recovery for Multi-Camera Systemscited by 1
- 2025Globally Optimal Solution to the Generalized Relative Pose Estimation Problem using Affine Correspondencescited by 1
- 2025A Minimal Solver for Relative Pose Estimation with Unknown Focal Length from Two Affine Correspondencescited by 1
- 2026Affine Correspondences in Stereo Vision: Theory, Practice, and Limitationscited by 0
- 2026Efficient Minimal Solvers for Visual-Inertial Relative Pose Estimation in Multi-Camera Systemscited by 0
- 2026Gravity-aware partially calibrated absolute pose estimation from affine- or rotation-covariant featurescited by 0
- 2026Gravity-aware partially calibrated absolute pose estimation from affine- or rotation-covariant features20 Aug 2026
- 2026Efficient Minimal Solvers for Visual-Inertial Relative Pose Estimation in Multi-Camera Systems8 Jun 2026
- 2026Affine Correspondences in Stereo Vision: Theory, Practice, and Limitations2 Mar 2026
- 2025A Minimal Solver for Relative Pose Estimation with Unknown Focal Length from Two Affine Correspondences28 Dec 2025
- 2025Globally Optimal Solution to the Generalized Relative Pose Estimation Problem using Affine Correspondences19 Dec 2025
- 2025TS-SNN: Temporal Shift Module for Spiking Neural Networks7 May 2025
- 2025STAA-SNN: Spatial-Temporal Attention Aggregator for Spiking Neural Networks4 Mar 2025
- 2022E-Graph: Minimal Solution for Rigid Rotation with Extensibility Graphs20 Jul 2022
- 2022DKM: Dense Kernelized Feature Matching for Geometry Estimation1 Feb 2022
- 2021Fusing the Old with the New: Learning Relative Camera Pose with Geometry-Guided Uncertainty16 Apr 2021
- 2021Trust Your IMU: Consequences of Ignoring the IMU Drift15 Mar 2021
- 2021On Relative Pose Recovery for Multi-Camera Systems24 Feb 2021