mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Adversarial Feature Distribution Alignment for Semi-Supervised Learning

arXiv 1912.10428 ↗First posted 22 Dec 2019cs.CVcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Training deep neural networks with only a few labeled samples can lead to overfitting. This is problematic in semi-supervised learning where only a few labeled samples are available. In this paper, we show that a consequence of overfitting in SSL is feature distribution misalignment between labeled and unlabeled samples. Hence, we propose a new feature distribution alignment method. Our method is particularly effective when using only a small amount of labeled samples. We test our method on CIFAR10 and SVHN. On SVHN we achieve a test error of 3.88% (250 labeled samples) and 3.39% (1000 labeled samples) which is close to the fully supervised model 2.89% (73k labeled samples). In comparison, the current SOTA achieves only 4.29% and 3.74%. Finally, we provide a theoretical insight why feature distribution alignment occurs and show that our method reduces it.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 22 Dec 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.

3 papers.