A sparse resultant based method for efficient minimal solvers
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Many computer vision applications require robust and efficient estimation of camera geometry. The robust estimation is usually based on solving camera geometry problems from a minimal number of input data measurements, i.e. solving minimal problems in a RANSAC framework. Minimal problems often result in complex systems of polynomial equations. Many state-of-the-art efficient polynomial solvers to these problems are based on Gr"obner bases and the action-matrix method that has been automatized and highly optimized in recent years. In this paper we study an alternative algebraic method for solving systems of polynomial equations, i.e., the sparse resultant-based method and propose a novel approach to convert the resultant constraint to an eigenvalue problem. This technique can significantly improve the efficiency and stability of existing resultant-based solvers. We applied our new resultant-based method to a large variety of computer vision problems and show that for most of the considered problems, the new method leads to solvers that are the same size as the the best available Gr"obner basis solvers and of similar accuracy. For some problems the new sparse-resultant based method leads to even smaller and more stable solvers than the state-of-the-art Gr"obner basis solvers. Our new method can be fully automatized and incorporated into existing tools for automatic generation of efficient polynomial solvers and as such it represents a competitive alternative to popular Gr"obner basis methods for minimal problems in computer vision.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 21 Dec 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 2; 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.
11 papers.
- 2021Learning to Solve Hard Minimal Problemscited by 19
- 2022Snapshot of Algebraic Visioncited by 9
- 2022Optimizing Elimination Templates by Greedy Parameter Searchcited by 8
- 2021Trust Your IMU: Consequences of Ignoring the IMU Driftcited by 3
- 2023Sparse resultant based minimal solvers in computer vision and their connection with the action matrixcited by 2
- 2023Automatic Solver Generator for Systems of Laurent Polynomial Equationscited by 2
- 2025Trifocal Tensor and Relative Pose Estimation with Known Vertical Directioncited by 2
- 2024Simulator HC: Regression-based Online Simulation of Starting Problem-Solution Pairs for Homotopy Continuation in Geometric Visioncited by 1
- 2025Three-view Focal Length Recovery From Homographiescited by 0
- 2025PLMP -- Point-Line Minimal Problems for Projective SfMcited by 0
- 2026Solving Minimal Problems Without Matrix Inversion Using FFT-Based Interpolationcited by 0
- 2026Solving Minimal Problems Without Matrix Inversion Using FFT-Based Interpolation7 May 2026
- 2025Trifocal Tensor and Relative Pose Estimation with Known Vertical Direction22 Dec 2025
- 2025PLMP -- Point-Line Minimal Problems for Projective SfM6 Mar 2025
- 2025Three-view Focal Length Recovery From Homographies13 Jan 2025
- 2024Simulator HC: Regression-based Online Simulation of Starting Problem-Solution Pairs for Homotopy Continuation in Geometric Vision6 Nov 2024
- 2023Automatic Solver Generator for Systems of Laurent Polynomial Equations1 Jul 2023
- 2023Sparse resultant based minimal solvers in computer vision and their connection with the action matrix16 Jan 2023
- 2022Snapshot of Algebraic Vision20 Oct 2022
- 2022Optimizing Elimination Templates by Greedy Parameter Search28 Mar 2022
- 2021Learning to Solve Hard Minimal Problems6 Dec 2021
- 2021Trust Your IMU: Consequences of Ignoring the IMU Drift15 Mar 2021