mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Features or Shape? Tackling the False Dichotomy of Time Series Classification

arXiv 1912.09614 ↗First posted 20 Dec 2019cs.LG stat.MLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Time series classification is an important task in its own right, and it is often a precursor to further downstream analytics. To date, virtually all works in the literature have used either shape-based classification using a distance measure or feature-based classification after finding some suitable features for the domain. It seems to be underappreciated that in many datasets it is the case that some classes are best discriminated with features, while others are best discriminated with shape. Thus, making the shape vs. feature choice will condemn us to poor results, at least for some classes. In this work, we propose a new model for classifying time series that allows the use of both shape and feature-based measures, when warranted. Our algorithm automatically decides which approach is best for which class, and at query time chooses which classifier to trust the most. We evaluate our idea on real world datasets and demonstrate that our ideas produce statistically significant improvement in classification accuracy.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 20 Dec 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1.

1 paper.