The Brier Score under Administrative Censoring: Problems and Solutions
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The Brier score is commonly used for evaluating probability predictions. In survival analysis, with right-censored observations of the event times, this score can be weighted by the inverse probability of censoring (IPCW) to retain its original interpretation. It is common practice to estimate the censoring distribution with the Kaplan-Meier estimator, even though it assumes that the censoring distribution is independent of the covariates. This paper discusses the general impact of the censoring estimates on the Brier score and shows that the estimation of the censoring distribution can be problematic. In particular, when the censoring times can be identified from the covariates, the IPCW score is no longer valid. For administratively censored data, where the potential censoring times are known for all individuals, we propose an alternative version of the Brier score. This administrative Brier score does not require estimation of the censoring distribution and is valid even if the censoring times can be identified from the covariates.
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 18 Dec 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 1; 2023: 3; 2024: 3; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
12 papers.
- 2021Survival Regression with Proper Scoring Rules and Monotonic Neural Networkscited by 42
- 2021X-CAL: Explicit Calibration for Survival Analysiscited by 30
- 2023An Effective Meaningful Way to Evaluate Survival Modelscited by 15
- 2023DySurv: dynamic deep learning model for survival analysis with conditional variational inferencecited by 9
- 2021Inverse-Weighted Survival Gamescited by 8
- 2024Dynamical Survival Analysis with Controlled Latent Statescited by 7
- 2024Survival Models: Proper Scoring Rule and Stochastic Optimization with Competing Riskscited by 6
- 2025SurvUnc: A Meta-Model Based Uncertainty Quantification Framework for Survival Analysiscited by 2
- 2022A copula-based boosting model for time-to-event prediction with dependent censoringcited by 1
- 2023Diffsurv: Differentiable sorting for censored time-to-event datacited by 0
- 2024Teaching Models To Survive: Proper Scoring Rule and Stochastic Optimization with Competing Riskscited by 0
- 2026Identifying and Characterising Response in Clinical Trials: Development and Validation of a Machine Learning Approach in Colorectal Cancercited by 0
- 2026Identifying and Characterising Response in Clinical Trials: Development and Validation of a Machine Learning Approach in Colorectal Cancer28 Feb 2026
- 2025SurvUnc: A Meta-Model Based Uncertainty Quantification Framework for Survival Analysis20 May 2025
- 2024Survival Models: Proper Scoring Rule and Stochastic Optimization with Competing Risks22 Oct 2024
- 2024Teaching Models To Survive: Proper Scoring Rule and Stochastic Optimization with Competing Risks20 Jun 2024
- 2024Dynamical Survival Analysis with Controlled Latent States30 Jan 2024
- 2023DySurv: dynamic deep learning model for survival analysis with conditional variational inference28 Oct 2023
- 2023An Effective Meaningful Way to Evaluate Survival Models1 Jun 2023
- 2023Diffsurv: Differentiable sorting for censored time-to-event data26 Apr 2023
- 2022A copula-based boosting model for time-to-event prediction with dependent censoring10 Oct 2022
- 2021Inverse-Weighted Survival Games16 Nov 2021
- 2021Survival Regression with Proper Scoring Rules and Monotonic Neural Networks26 Mar 2021
- 2021X-CAL: Explicit Calibration for Survival Analysis13 Jan 2021