mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Open Set Authorship Attribution toward Demystifying Victorian Periodicals

arXiv 1912.08259 ↗First posted 17 Dec 2019cs.CLcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Existing research in computational authorship attribution (AA) has primarily focused on attribution tasks with a limited number of authors in a closed-set configuration. This restricted set-up is far from being realistic in dealing with highly entangled real-world AA tasks that involve a large number of candidate authors for attribution during test time. In this paper, we study AA in historical texts using anew data set compiled from the Victorian literature. We investigate the predictive capacity of most common English words in distinguishing writings of most prominent Victorian novelists. We challenged the closed-set classification assumption and discussed the limitations of standard machine learning techniques in dealing with the open set AA task. Our experiments suggest that a linear classifier can achieve near perfect attribution accuracy under closed set assumption yet, the need for more robust approaches becomes evident once a large candidate pool has to be considered in the open-set classification setting.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 17 Dec 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

3 papers.