mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Fingerprint Spoof Detection: Temporal Analysis of Image Sequence

arXiv 1912.08240 ↗First posted 17 Dec 2019cs.CVcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We utilize the dynamics involved in the imaging of a fingerprint on a touch-based fingerprint reader, such as perspiration, changes in skin color (blanching), and skin distortion, to differentiate real fingers from spoof (fake) fingers. Specifically, we utilize a deep learning-based architecture (CNN-LSTM) trained end-to-end using sequences of minutiae-centered local patches extracted from ten color frames captured on a COTS fingerprint reader. A time-distributed CNN (MobileNet-v1) extracts spatial features from each local patch, while a bi-directional LSTM layer learns the temporal relationship between the patches in the sequence. Experimental results on a database of 26,650 live frames from 685 subjects (1,333 unique fingers), and 32,910 spoof frames of 7 spoof materials (with 14 variants) shows the superiority of the proposed approach in both known-material and cross-material (generalization) scenarios. For instance, the proposed approach improves the state-of-the-art cross-material performance from TDR of 81.65% to 86.20% @ FDR = 0.2%.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 17 Dec 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1.

1 paper.