mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

The Benefits of Close-Domain Fine-Tuning for Table Detection in Document Images

arXiv 1912.05846 ↗First posted 12 Dec 2019cs.CV cs.CL cs.LGcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

A correct localisation of tables in a document is instrumental for determining their structure and extracting their contents; therefore, table detection is a key step in table understanding. Nowadays, the most successful methods for table detection in document images employ deep learning algorithms; and, particularly, a technique known as fine-tuning. In this context, such a technique exports the knowledge acquired to detect objects in natural images to detect tables in document images. However, there is only a vague relation between natural and document images, and fine-tuning works better when there is a close relation between the source and target task. In this paper, we show that it is more beneficial to employ fine-tuning from a closer domain. To this aim, we train different object detection algorithms (namely, Mask R-CNN, RetinaNet, SSD and YOLO) using the TableBank dataset (a dataset of images of academic documents designed for table detection and recognition), and fine-tune them for several heterogeneous table detection datasets. Using this approach, we considerably improve the accuracy of the detection models fine-tuned from natural images (in mean a 17%, and, in the best case, up to a 60%).

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 12 Dec 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

6 papers.