mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

The Use of Deep Learning for Symbolic Integration: A Review of (Lample and Charton, 2019)

arXiv 1912.05752 ↗First posted 12 Dec 2019cs.LGcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Lample and Charton (2019) describe a system that uses deep learning technology to compute symbolic, indefinite integrals, and to find symbolic solutions to first- and second-order ordinary differential equations, when the solutions are elementary functions. They found that, over a particular test set, the system could find solutions more successfully than sophisticated packages for symbolic mathematics such as Mathematica run with a long time-out. This is an impressive accomplishment, as far as it goes. However, the system can handle only a quite limited subset of the problems that Mathematica deals with, and the test set has significant built-in biases. Therefore the claim that this outperforms Mathematica on symbolic integration needs to be very much qualified.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 12 Dec 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 4; 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 3; 2025: 1.

11 papers.