Forward and Backward Feature Selection for Query Performance Prediction
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The goal of query performance prediction (QPP) is to automatically estimate the effectiveness of a search result for any given query, without relevance judgements. Post-retrieval features have been shown to be more effective for this task while being more expensive to compute than pre-retrieval features. Combining multiple post-retrieval features is even more effective, but state-of-the-art QPP methods are impossible to interpret because of the black-box nature of the employed machine learning models. However, interpretation is useful for understanding the predictive model and providing more answers about its behavior. Moreover, combining many post-retrieval features is not applicable to real-world cases, since the query running time is of utter importance. In this paper, we investigate a new framework for feature selection in which the trained model explains well the prediction. We introduce a step-wise (forward and backward) model selection approach where different subsets of query features are used to fit different models from which the system selects the best one. We evaluate our approach on four TREC collections using standard QPP features. We also develop two QPP features to address the issue of query-drift in the query feedback setting. We found that: (1) our model based on a limited number of selected features is as good as more complex models for QPP and better than non-selective models; (2) our model is more efficient than complex models during inference time since it requires fewer features; (3) the predictive model is readable and understandable; and (4) one of our new QPP features is consistently selected across different collections, proving its usefulness.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 4 Dec 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
5 papers.
- 2023iQPP: A Benchmark for Image Query Performance Predictioncited by 2
- 2024PQPP: A Joint Benchmark for Text-to-Image Prompt and Query Performance Predictioncited by 2
- 2025Uncovering the Limitations of Query Performance Prediction: Failures, Insights, and Implications for Selective Query Processingcited by 2
- 2024WEEP: A method for spatial interpretation of weakly supervised CNN models in computational pathologycited by 1
- 2026VQPP: Video Query Performance Prediction Benchmarkcited by 0
- 2026VQPP: Video Query Performance Prediction Benchmark19 Feb 2026
- 2025Uncovering the Limitations of Query Performance Prediction: Failures, Insights, and Implications for Selective Query Processing1 Apr 2025
- 2024PQPP: A Joint Benchmark for Text-to-Image Prompt and Query Performance Prediction7 Jun 2024
- 2024WEEP: A method for spatial interpretation of weakly supervised CNN models in computational pathology22 Mar 2024
- 2023iQPP: A Benchmark for Image Query Performance Prediction20 Feb 2023