Stealing Knowledge from Protected Deep Neural Networks Using Composite Unlabeled Data
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
As state-of-the-art deep neural networks are deployed at the core of more advanced Al-based products and services, the incentive for copying them (i.e., their intellectual properties) by rival adversaries is expected to increase considerably over time. The best way to extract or steal knowledge from such networks is by querying them using a large dataset of random samples and recording their output, followed by training a student network to mimic these outputs, without making any assumption about the original networks. The most effective way to protect against such a mimicking attack is to provide only the classification result, without confidence values associated with the softmax layer.In this paper, we present a novel method for generating composite images for attacking a mentor neural network using a student model. Our method assumes no information regarding the mentor's training dataset, architecture, or weights. Further assuming no information regarding the mentor's softmax output values, our method successfully mimics the given neural network and steals all of its knowledge. We also demonstrate that our student network (which copies the mentor) is impervious to watermarking protection methods, and thus would not be detected as a stolen model.Our results imply, essentially, that all current neural networks are vulnerable to mimicking attacks, even if they do not divulge anything but the most basic required output, and that the student model which mimics them cannot be easily detected and singled out as a stolen copy using currently available techniques.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 9 Dec 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 3.
8 papers.
- 2022I Know What You Trained Last Summer: A Survey on Stealing Machine Learning Models and Defencescited by 75
- 2023Identifying Appropriate Intellectual Property Protection Mechanisms for Machine Learning Models: A Systematization of Watermarking, Fingerprinting, Model Access, and Attackscited by 12
- 2021Copycat CNN: Are Random Non-Labeled Data Enough to Steal Knowledge from Black-box Models?cited by 3
- 2023Towards Few-Call Model Stealing via Active Self-Paced Knowledge Distillation and Diffusion-Based Image Generationcited by 2
- 2025Models That Are Interpretable But Not Transparentcited by 1
- 2024Stealing the Invisible: Unveiling Pre-Trained CNN Models through Adversarial Examples and Timing Side-Channelscited by 0
- 2025Attackers Can Do Better: Over- and Understated Factors of Model Stealing Attackscited by 0
- 2025I Stolenly Swear That I Am Up to (No) Good: Design and Evaluation of Model Stealing Attackscited by 0
- 2025I Stolenly Swear That I Am Up to (No) Good: Design and Evaluation of Model Stealing Attacks29 Aug 2025
- 2025Attackers Can Do Better: Over- and Understated Factors of Model Stealing Attacks8 Mar 2025
- 2025Models That Are Interpretable But Not Transparent26 Feb 2025
- 2024Stealing the Invisible: Unveiling Pre-Trained CNN Models through Adversarial Examples and Timing Side-Channels19 Feb 2024
- 2023Towards Few-Call Model Stealing via Active Self-Paced Knowledge Distillation and Diffusion-Based Image Generation29 Sep 2023
- 2023Identifying Appropriate Intellectual Property Protection Mechanisms for Machine Learning Models: A Systematization of Watermarking, Fingerprinting, Model Access, and Attacks22 Apr 2023
- 2022I Know What You Trained Last Summer: A Survey on Stealing Machine Learning Models and Defences16 Jun 2022
- 2021Copycat CNN: Are Random Non-Labeled Data Enough to Steal Knowledge from Black-box Models?21 Jan 2021