mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Selective Synthetic Augmentation with Quality Assurance

arXiv 1912.03837 ↗First posted 9 Dec 2019cs.CVcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Supervised training of an automated medical image analysis system often requires a large amount of expert annotations that are hard to collect. Moreover, the proportions of data available across different classes may be highly imbalanced for rare diseases. To mitigate these issues, we investigate a novel data augmentation pipeline that selectively adds new synthetic images generated by conditional Adversarial Networks (cGANs), rather than extending directly the training set with synthetic images. The selection mechanisms that we introduce to the synthetic augmentation pipeline are motivated by the observation that, although cGAN-generated images can be visually appealing, they are not guaranteed to contain essential features for classification performance improvement. By selecting synthetic images based on the confidence of their assigned labels and their feature similarity to real labeled images, our framework provides quality assurance to synthetic augmentation by ensuring that adding the selected synthetic images to the training set will improve performance. We evaluate our model on a medical histopathology dataset, and two natural image classification benchmarks, CIFAR10 and SVHN. Results on these datasets show significant and consistent improvements in classification performance (with 6.8%, 3.9%, 1.6% higher accuracy, respectively) by leveraging cGAN generated images with selective augmentation.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 9 Dec 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 0; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

2 papers.