A Comprehensive Survey on Machine Learning Techniques and User Authentication Approaches for Credit Card Fraud Detection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
With the increase of credit card usage, the volume of credit card misuse also has significantly increased. As a result, financial organizations are working hard on developing and deploying credit card fraud detection methods, in order to adapt to ever-evolving, increasingly sophisticated defrauding strategies and identifying illicit transactions as quickly as possible to protect themselves and their customers. Compounding on the complex nature of such adverse strategies, credit card fraudulent activities are rare events compared to the number of legitimate transactions. Hence, the challenge to develop fraud detection that are accurate and efficient is substantially intensified and, as a consequence, credit card fraud detection has lately become a very active area of research. In this work, we provide a survey of current techniques most relevant to the problem of credit card fraud detection. We carry out our survey in two main parts. In the first part,we focus on studies utilizing classical machine learning models, which mostly employ traditional transnational features to make fraud predictions. These models typically rely on some static physical characteristics, such as what the user knows (knowledge-based method), or what he/she has access to (object-based method). In the second part of our survey, we review more advanced techniques of user authentication, which use behavioral biometrics to identify an individual based on his/her unique behavior while he/she is interacting with his/her electronic devices. These approaches rely on how people behave (instead of what they do), which cannot be easily forged. By providing an overview of current approaches and the results reported in the literature, this survey aims to drive the future research agenda for the community in order to develop more accurate, reliable and scalable models of credit card fraud detection.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 2 Dec 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.
5 papers.
- 2022Human-AI Collaboration in Decision-Making: Beyond Learning to Defercited by 16
- 2022Online User Profiling to Detect Social Bots on Twittercited by 7
- 2026Density-Ratio Losses for Post-Hoc Learning to Defercited by 1
- 2026SAGE: An LLM-driven Self Reflective Agentic Framework for Fraud Detectioncited by 1
- 2023Attention Paper: How Generative AI Reshapes Digital Shadow Industry?cited by 0
- 2026SAGE: An LLM-driven Self Reflective Agentic Framework for Fraud Detection6 Jun 2026
- 2026Density-Ratio Losses for Post-Hoc Learning to Defer19 May 2026
- 2023Attention Paper: How Generative AI Reshapes Digital Shadow Industry?26 May 2023
- 2022Human-AI Collaboration in Decision-Making: Beyond Learning to Defer27 Jun 2022
- 2022Online User Profiling to Detect Social Bots on Twitter9 Mar 2022