mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

One-Shot Pruning of Recurrent Neural Networks by Jacobian Spectrum Evaluation

arXiv 1912.00120 ↗First posted 30 Nov 2019cs.LG stat.MLcited by 14

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent advances in the sparse neural network literature have made it possible to prune many large feed forward and convolutional networks with only a small quantity of data. Yet, these same techniques often falter when applied to the problem of recovering sparse recurrent networks. These failures are quantitative: when pruned with recent techniques, RNNs typically obtain worse performance than they do under a simple random pruning scheme. The failures are also qualitative: the distribution of active weights in a pruned LSTM or GRU network tend to be concentrated in specific neurons and gates, and not well dispersed across the entire architecture. We seek to rectify both the quantitative and qualitative issues with recurrent network pruning by introducing a new recurrent pruning objective derived from the spectrum of the recurrent Jacobian. Our objective is data efficient (requiring only 64 data points to prune the network), easy to implement, and produces 95% sparse GRUs that significantly improve on existing baselines. We evaluate on sequential MNIST, Billion Words, and Wikitext.

Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 30 Nov 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 6; 2022: 4; 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

14 papers.

Sort: