mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Cross-trait prediction accuracy of high-dimensional ridge-type estimators in genome-wide association studies

arXiv 1911.10142 ↗First posted 22 Nov 2019stat.MEcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Marginal association summary statistics have attracted great attention in statistical genetics, mainly because the primary results of most genome-wide association studies (GWAS) are produced by marginal screening. In this paper, we study the prediction accuracy of marginal estimator in dense (or sparsity free) high-dimensional settings with (n,p,m) → ∞, m/n → γ ∈ (0,∞), and p/n → ω ∈ (0,∞). We consider a general correlation structure among the p features and allow an unknown subset m of them to be signals. As the marginal estimator can be viewed as a ridge estimator with regularization parameter λ → ∞, we further investigate a class of ridge-type estimators in a unifying framework, including the popular best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) in genetics. We find that the influence of λ on out-of-sample prediction accuracy heavily depends on ω. Though selecting an optimal λ can be important when p and n are comparable, it turns out that the out-of-sample R2 of ridge-type estimators becomes near-optimal for any λ ∈ (0,∞) as ω increases. For example, when features are independent, the out-of-sample R2 is always bounded by 1/ω from above and is largely invariant to λ given large ω (say, ω>5). We also find that in-sample R2 has completely different patterns and depends much more on λ than out-of-sample R2. In practice, our analysis delivers useful messages for genome-wide polygenic risk prediction and computation-accuracy trade-off in dense high-dimensions. We numerically illustrate our results in simulation studies and a real data example.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 22 Nov 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1.

1 paper.