Cost-Based Goal Recognition Meets Deep Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The ability to observe the effects of actions performed by others and to infer their intent, most likely goals, or course of action, is known as a plan or intention recognition cognitive capability and has long been one of the fundamental research challenges in AI. Deep learning has recently been making significant inroads on various pattern recognition problems, except for intention recognition. While extensively explored since the seventies, the problem remains unsolved for most interesting cases in various areas, ranging from natural language understanding to human behavior understanding based on video feeds. This paper compares symbolic inverse planning, one of the most investigated approaches to goal recognition, to deep learning using CNN and LTSM neural network architectures, on five synthetic benchmarks often used in the literature. The results show that the deep learning approach achieves better goal-prediction accuracy and timeliness than the symbolic cost-based plan recognizer in these domains. Although preliminary, these results point to interesting future research avenues.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 22 Nov 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 1.
2 papers.
- 2022Goal Recognition as a Deep Learning Task: the GRNet Approachcited by 9
- 2024ODGR: Online Dynamic Goal Recognitioncited by 5
- 2024ODGR: Online Dynamic Goal Recognition23 Jul 2024
- 2022Goal Recognition as a Deep Learning Task: the GRNet Approach5 Oct 2022