mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Neural Network Memorization Dissection

arXiv 1911.09537 ↗First posted 21 Nov 2019cs.LG stat.MLcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep neural networks (DNNs) can easily fit a random labeling of the training data with zero training error. What is the difference between DNNs trained with random labels and the ones trained with true labels? Our paper answers this question with two contributions. First, we study the memorization properties of DNNs. Our empirical experiments shed light on how DNNs prioritize the learning of simple input patterns. In the second part, we propose to measure the similarity between what different DNNs have learned and memorized. With the proposed approach, we analyze and compare DNNs trained on data with true labels and random labels. The analysis shows that DNNs have textitOne way to Learn and textitN ways to Memorize. We also use gradient information to gain an understanding of the analysis results.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 21 Nov 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 2.

7 papers.